TGT vs. EPRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Target Corporation (TGT) and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT).

Performance

TGT vs. EPRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Target Corporation (TGT) and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TGT vs. EPRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TGT Target Corporation	25.25%	-24.50%	-2.27%	-1.35%	-34.24%	32.91%	40.47%	100.17%	-11.79%
EPRT Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.	3.40%	-1.40%	27.32%	14.20%	-14.60%	41.19%	-9.72%	86.75%	3.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TGT : $56.13B EPRT : $6.12B
EPS TGT : $8.83 EPRT : $1.26
PE Ratio TGT : 13.72 EPRT : 24.04
PS Ratio TGT : 0.52 EPRT : 10.84
PB Ratio TGT : 3.47 EPRT : 1.46
Total Revenue (TTM) TGT : $106.25B EPRT : $561.22M
Gross Profit (TTM) TGT : $29.05B EPRT : $405.75M
EBITDA (TTM) TGT : $8.77B EPRT : $453.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly higher than EPRT's 3.40% return.

TGT

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 6.51%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 38.21%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: -6.58%
• 5Y*: -6.93%
• 10Y*: 7.04%

EPRT

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -9.64%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: -3.18%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TGT vs. EPRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGT

TGT Risk / Return Rank: 62
TGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TGT Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EPRT

EPRT Risk / Return Rank: 33
EPRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EPRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EPRT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EPRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EPRT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGT vs. EPRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGT	EPRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	-0.16	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	-0.09	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.99	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	-0.17	+1.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	-0.38	+2.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGT vs. EPRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the EPRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGT and EPRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGT	EPRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	-0.16	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.43	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.41	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between TGT and EPRT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TGT vs. EPRT - Dividend Comparison

TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than EPRT's 4.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TGT Target Corporation	3.75%	4.62%	3.28%	3.06%	2.66%	1.37%	1.52%	2.03%	3.81%	3.74%	3.21%	2.97%
EPRT Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.	4.02%	4.06%	3.71%	4.38%	4.58%	3.47%	4.39%	3.55%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TGT vs. EPRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, smaller than the maximum EPRT drawdown of -73.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and EPRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGT	EPRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.40%	-73.67%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.27%	-12.73%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.40%	-38.42%	-25.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.91%	-11.34%	-36.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-14.07%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.55%	5.73%	+3.82%

Volatility

TGT vs. EPRT - Volatility Comparison

Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) at 4.12%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGT	EPRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.59%	4.12%	+4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.01%	12.53%	+8.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.54%	20.20%	+14.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.19%	22.87%	+12.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.20%	38.90%	-5.70%

Financials

TGT vs. EPRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Target Corporation and Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.89B and revenue of 31.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.

EPRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 149.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.87B and revenue of 31.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

EPRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 98.75M and revenue of 149.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.9%.

TGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 31.92B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

EPRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 68.07M and revenue of 149.87M, resulting in a net margin of 45.4%.