PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGS vs. YPF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TGS vs. YPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGS achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than YPF's 36.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TGS has outperformed YPF with an annualized return of 19.37%, while YPF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


TGS

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.39%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.48%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
43.49%
10Y*
19.37%

YPF

1D
-1.94%
1M
3.08%
YTD
36.81%
6M
39.31%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
49.55%
5Y*
57.84%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGS vs. YPF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
1.35%6.22%93.97%27.88%165.77%-14.62%-27.48%-45.44%-28.91%146.45%
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
36.81%-14.94%147.29%87.05%140.58%-18.72%-59.41%-12.86%-41.18%39.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TGS and YPF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1994

0.35

Over the past year, TGS and YPF have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGS:

$4.74B

YPF:

$19.40B

EPS

TGS:

ARS 3.05K

YPF:

-$3.19K

PS Ratio

TGS:

3.82

YPF:

0.00

PB Ratio

TGS:

1.94

YPF:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGS:

ARS 1.82T

YPF:

$13.23T

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGS:

ARS 985.40B

YPF:

$3.80T

EBITDA (TTM)

TGS:

ARS 1.03T

YPF:

$4.05T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGS vs. YPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGS
TGS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

YPF
YPF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
YPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
YPF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
YPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
YPF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGS vs. YPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGSYPFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.23

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

3.42

-2.26

TGS vs. YPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the YPF Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGS and YPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGS vs. YPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGS drawdown since its inception was -95.49%, roughly equal to the maximum YPF drawdown of -94.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGS and YPF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGSYPFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.49%

-94.58%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.96%

-34.89%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.49%

-48.79%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.49%

-48.79%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.55%

-90.08%

+9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-12.21%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.01%

-39.08%

-7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

12.71%

+0.32%

Volatility

TGS vs. YPF - Volatility Comparison

Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) has a higher volatility of 12.95% compared to YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) at 11.68%. This indicates that TGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGSYPFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.95%

11.68%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.30%

28.15%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.85%

53.47%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.49%

54.77%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.44%

54.76%

-0.32%

Dividends

TGS vs. YPF - Dividend Comparison

Neither TGS nor YPF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.46%5.04%0.00%0.34%0.00%
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.19%0.60%0.32%0.66%0.80%

Financials

TGS vs. YPF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. and YPF Sociedad Anónima. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00T7.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
484.20B
4.94B
(TGS) Total Revenue
(YPF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TGS values in ARS, YPF values in USD

TGS vs. YPF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. and YPF Sociedad Anónima over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
58.3%
35.5%
Portfolio components
TGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a gross profit of 282.03B and revenue of 484.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

YPF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

TGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported an operating income of 249.34B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.5%.

YPF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 873.00M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

TGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a net income of 159.98B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.

YPF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YPF Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 404.00M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TGS and YPF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGS has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to YPF (11.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGS dropped -95.49% vs YPF's -94.58%.

YPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGS and YPF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer