TGS vs. FANG
TGS (Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — TGS in Oil & Gas Midstream, FANG in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, TGS returned 19.37%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for FANG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGS vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGS achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 26.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TGS has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 19.37%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.
TGS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.68%
- 5Y*
- 43.49%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
FANG
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 27.95%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
TGS vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGS Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. | 1.35% | 6.22% | 93.97% | 27.88% | 165.77% | -14.62% | -27.48% | -45.44% | -28.91% | 146.45% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 26.36% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGS and FANG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.24 |
The correlation between TGS and FANG shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGS:
$4.74B
FANG:
$53.11B
TGS:
ARS 3.05K
FANG:
$1.40
TGS:
15.11
FANG:
134.03
TGS:
3.82
FANG:
3.56
TGS:
1.94
FANG:
1.46
TGS:
ARS 1.82T
FANG:
$15.19B
TGS:
ARS 985.40B
FANG:
$7.30B
TGS:
ARS 1.03T
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGS vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
TGS
FANG
TGS vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.16 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 5.34 | -4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGS vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGS drawdown since its inception was -95.49%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGS and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.49% | -88.72% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.96% | -13.66% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.49% | -42.10% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.49% | -42.10% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.55% | -88.72% | +8.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.79% | -11.63% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.01% | -19.36% | -27.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 5.74% | +7.29% |
Volatility
TGS vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) has a higher volatility of 12.95% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 11.06%. This indicates that TGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGS | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | 11.06% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.30% | 23.71% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.85% | 31.26% | +29.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.49% | 37.84% | +17.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.44% | 49.07% | +5.37% |
Dividends
TGS vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
TGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.21% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGS Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.46% | 5.04% | 0.00% | 0.34% |
Financials
TGS vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGS vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
TGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a gross profit of 282.03B and revenue of 484.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
TGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported an operating income of 249.34B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.5%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
TGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a net income of 159.98B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGS and FANG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGS has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to FANG (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGS dropped -95.49% vs FANG's -88.72%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGS and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer