TGRW vs. VBR
TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. TGRW is actively managed, while VBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGRW returned 10.24%/yr vs 8.08%/yr for VBR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGRW charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
TGRW vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 12.11% return.
TGRW
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VBR
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
TGRW vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 7.16% | 15.62% | 29.94% | 48.87% | -38.42% | 14.97% | 15.75% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.11% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 26.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRW and VBR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TGRW and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TGRW vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRW
VBR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TGRW
VBR
Communication Services
TGRW
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
TGRW
VBR
Healthcare
TGRW
VBR
Financial Services
TGRW
VBR
Industrials
TGRW
VBR
Consumer Defensive
TGRW
VBR
Basic Materials
TGRW
VBR
Real Estate
TGRW
VBR
Energy
TGRW
-
VBR
Utilities
TGRW
-
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRW vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
TGRW
VBR
TGRW vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRW | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.84 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.70 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 3.10 | -1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 10.94 | -6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRW | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.84 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.42 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
TGRW vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRW | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.33% | -61.98% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -8.85% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.18% | -24.19% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.33% | -24.19% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.48% | -8.27% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.94% | 2.50% | +3.44% |
Volatility
TGRW vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is 3.65%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that TGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRW | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 4.07% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 10.46% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 15.17% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 19.77% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 21.74% | +1.28% |
TGRW vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRW vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRW and VBR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBR has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to TGRW (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 5-year performance, TGRW leads with 10.24% vs 8.08% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, TGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TGRW has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.05% for VBR.
VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRW and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer