PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRW vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRW vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 12.11% return.


TGRW

1D
-0.55%
1M
7.01%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.15%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*

VBR

1D
0.86%
1M
1.86%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.63%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRW vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
7.16%15.62%29.94%48.87%-38.42%14.97%15.75%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.11%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRW and VBR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.57

The correlation between TGRW and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TGRW vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGRW
VBR

Technology

52.0%
10.6%

Communication Services

15.6%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.4%

Healthcare

7.4%
7.9%

Financial Services

5.6%
17.6%

Industrials

4.6%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.7%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
10.1%

Energy

-

5.2%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Technology

TGRW
52.0%
VBR
10.6%

Communication Services

TGRW
15.6%
VBR
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TGRW
12.5%
VBR
12.4%

Healthcare

TGRW
7.4%
VBR
7.9%

Financial Services

TGRW
5.6%
VBR
17.6%

Industrials

TGRW
4.6%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

TGRW
0.9%
VBR
4.0%

Basic Materials

TGRW
0.7%
VBR
6.3%

Real Estate

TGRW
0.6%
VBR
10.1%

Energy

TGRW

-

VBR
5.2%

Utilities

TGRW

-

VBR
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRW vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRW vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRWVBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.84

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.70

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.10

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.12

10.94

-6.82

TGRW vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRW and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRWVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.84

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.42

+0.12

Drawdowns

TGRW vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRWVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-61.98%

+18.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-8.85%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

-24.19%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

-24.19%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-8.27%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

2.50%

+3.44%

Volatility

TGRW vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is 3.65%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that TGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRWVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

4.07%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

10.46%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

15.17%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.27%

19.77%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

21.74%

+1.28%

TGRW vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRW vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRW and VBR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to TGRW (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 5-year performance, TGRW leads with 10.24% vs 8.08% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, TGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TGRW has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRW and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer