TFPM vs. GFI
TFPM (Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — TFPM in Other Precious Metals & Mining, GFI in Gold. Over the past 3 years, TFPM returned 29.62%/yr vs 38.59%/yr for GFI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TFPM vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -10.57% return.
TFPM
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFI
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -4.40%
- 1Y
- 58.92%
- 3Y*
- 38.59%
- 5Y*
- 31.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.88%
TFPM vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | -9.80% | 123.03% | 14.60% | -1.81% | 14.71% | 33.50% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -10.57% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 35.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPM and GFI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, TFPM and GFI have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TFPM:
$6.19B
GFI:
$33.93B
TFPM:
$1.51
GFI:
$5.39
TFPM:
19.75
GFI:
7.04
TFPM:
0.15
GFI:
0.11
TFPM:
13.55
GFI:
2.43
TFPM:
2.87
GFI:
4.02
TFPM:
$453.24M
GFI:
$13.98B
TFPM:
$337.23M
GFI:
$7.34B
TFPM:
$354.95M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFPM vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
TFPM
GFI
TFPM vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFPM | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.01 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.55 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.62 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 3.90 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFPM | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.01 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.13 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
TFPM vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPM | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.48% | -88.05% | +51.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.55% | -36.52% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.55% | -36.52% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.55% | -36.52% | +8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -44.27% | +30.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 15.14% | -4.12% |
Volatility
TFPM vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) is 15.34%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that TFPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFPM | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 17.66% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.07% | 45.36% | -12.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.69% | 58.92% | -16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 52.17% | -14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 54.85% | -17.58% |
Dividends
TFPM vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than GFI's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 4.85% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | 0.77% | 0.68% | 1.43% | 1.54% | 1.07% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TFPM vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TFPM vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
TFPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
TFPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
TFPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TFPM and GFI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to TFPM (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFPM and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer