PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPM vs. GFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFPM vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -10.57% return.


TFPM

1D
-3.43%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-9.80%
6M
-7.74%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
10Y*

GFI

1D
-1.61%
1M
-9.21%
YTD
-10.57%
6M
-4.40%
1Y
58.92%
3Y*
38.59%
5Y*
31.37%
10Y*
27.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPM vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-9.80%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%33.50%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-10.57%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%35.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPM and GFI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.52

Over the past year, TFPM and GFI have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TFPM:

$6.19B

GFI:

$33.93B

EPS

TFPM:

$1.51

GFI:

$5.39

PE Ratio

TFPM:

19.75

GFI:

7.04

PEG Ratio

TFPM:

0.15

GFI:

0.11

PS Ratio

TFPM:

13.55

GFI:

2.43

PB Ratio

TFPM:

2.87

GFI:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFPM:

$453.24M

GFI:

$13.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFPM:

$337.23M

GFI:

$7.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

TFPM:

$354.95M

GFI:

$8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPM vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPM vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFPMGFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.01

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

1.55

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.62

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.36

3.90

-1.55

TFPM vs. GFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPM and GFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFPMGFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.01

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.13

+0.69

Drawdowns

TFPM vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and GFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPMGFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-88.05%

+51.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.55%

-36.52%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

-36.52%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.55%

-36.52%

+8.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-44.27%

+30.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

15.14%

-4.12%

Volatility

TFPM vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) is 15.34%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that TFPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPMGFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

17.66%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.07%

45.36%

-12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.69%

58.92%

-16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

52.17%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

54.85%

-17.58%

Dividends

TFPM vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than GFI's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
4.85%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.77%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TFPM vs. GFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
144.96M
5.29B
(TFPM) Total Revenue
(GFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TFPM vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
72.0%
56.7%
Portfolio components
TFPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

TFPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

TFPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFPM and GFI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFI has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to TFPM (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs GFI's -88.05%.

GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPM and GFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer