TFC vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TFC or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between TFC and MMC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TFC vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TFC:
1.49
MMC:
0.80
TFC:
2.33
MMC:
1.13
TFC:
1.27
MMC:
1.15
TFC:
0.95
MMC:
1.06
TFC:
7.92
MMC:
3.10
TFC:
5.08%
MMC:
3.62%
TFC:
27.03%
MMC:
14.07%
TFC:
-66.56%
MMC:
-67.46%
TFC:
-17.49%
MMC:
-7.72%
Fundamentals
TFC:
$63.26B
MMC:
$106.22B
TFC:
-$4.86
MMC:
$8.07
TFC:
1.94
MMC:
2.28
TFC:
$13.97B
MMC:
$18.39B
TFC:
$13.39B
MMC:
$8.03B
TFC:
$2.00B
MMC:
$5.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 6.61%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.29% annualized return.
TFC
9.84%
10.00%
11.46%
33.90%
1.25%
6.61%
MMC
1.33%
1.65%
-1.00%
9.68%
15.42%
16.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TFC vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TFC
MMC
TFC vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TFC vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than MMC's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 4.37% | 4.79% | 5.63% | 4.65% | 3.18% | 3.76% | 3.04% | 3.60% | 2.53% | 2.45% | 2.78% | 2.44% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
TFC vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TFC vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.81%. This indicates that TFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TFC vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Truist Financial Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities