PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TFC vs. MMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TFCMMC
YTD Return28.97%20.68%
1Y Return63.34%15.55%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.37%12.60%
5Y Return (Ann)0.69%18.69%
10Y Return (Ann)5.61%16.97%
Sharpe Ratio2.121.11
Sortino Ratio3.151.47
Omega Ratio1.361.21
Calmar Ratio1.141.99
Martin Ratio13.465.78
Ulcer Index4.41%2.81%
Daily Std Dev28.00%14.65%
Max Drawdown-66.56%-67.46%
Current Drawdown-21.70%-2.44%

Fundamentals


TFCMMC
Market Cap$60.03B$110.68B
EPS-$4.86$8.18
PEG Ratio2.062.40
Total Revenue (TTM)$25.14B$23.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$21.81B$10.31B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.97B$6.95B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between TFC and MMC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TFC vs. MMC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 5.61%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.32%
10.46%
TFC
MMC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TFC vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TFC, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TFC, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TFC, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TFC, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TFC, currently valued at 13.46, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0013.46
MMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMC, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MMC, currently valued at 5.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.78

TFC vs. MMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFC Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the MMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFC and MMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12
1.11
TFC
MMC

Dividends

TFC vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison

TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than MMC's 1.35% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.60%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%2.44%3.00%
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.35%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%1.99%

Drawdowns

TFC vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-21.70%
-2.44%
TFC
MMC

Volatility

TFC vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a higher volatility of 12.85% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.34%. This indicates that TFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.85%
3.34%
TFC
MMC

Financials

TFC vs. MMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Truist Financial Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items