PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFC vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFC vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 8.09%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.44% annualized return.


TFC

1D
0.85%
1M
8.39%
6M
8.11%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
8.09%

JPM

1D
-1.08%
1M
4.09%
6M
12.03%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
33.70%
5Y*
20.68%
10Y*
21.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFC vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
10.46%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
8.01%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TFC and JPM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.59

The correlation between TFC and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TFC:

$66.34B

JPM:

$919.47B

EPS

TFC:

$4.30

JPM:

$23.29

PE Ratio

TFC:

12.39

JPM:

14.73

PEG Ratio

TFC:

1.45

JPM:

1.63

PS Ratio

TFC:

2.25

JPM:

3.22

PB Ratio

TFC:

1.14

JPM:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFC:

$30.47B

JPM:

$297.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFC:

$19.17B

JPM:

$186.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

TFC:

$6.99B

JPM:

$90.84B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFC vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFC vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFCJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.45

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

3.43

-0.32

TFC vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFC and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFC vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-76.16%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-15.47%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-24.42%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.11%

-38.77%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-43.63%

-15.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-1.08%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-17.58%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.19%

6.52%

+1.67%

Volatility

TFC vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) is 6.69%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that TFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

7.21%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

16.67%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.07%

22.15%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.82%

24.47%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.58%

27.29%

+6.29%

Dividends

TFC vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than JPM's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
3.91%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Financials

TFC vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Truist Financial Corporation and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
7.41B
82.46B
(TFC) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TFC vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Truist Financial Corporation and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
63.1%
66.5%
Portfolio components
TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.67B and revenue of 7.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 54.83B and revenue of 82.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 27.52B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 21.16B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFC and JPM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to TFC (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFC dropped -66.56% vs JPM's -76.16%.

TFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFC and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer