PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEX vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Terex Corporation (TEX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, TEX has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 12.74%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.43% annualized return.


TEX

1D
5.32%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
15.17%
6M
32.21%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
12.74%

MSFT

1D
-4.17%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-9.54%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
25.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEX
Terex Corporation
15.17%17.25%-18.59%36.10%-1.44%27.22%17.82%9.67%-42.22%54.26%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-8.34%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TEX and MSFT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between TEX and MSFT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

TEX:

$2.24

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

TEX:

27.36

MSFT:

26.28

PEG Ratio

TEX:

2.29

MSFT:

1.84

PS Ratio

TEX:

0.51

MSFT:

10.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEX:

$5.93B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEX:

$1.03B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TEX:

$449.00M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEX
TEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Terex Corporation (TEX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEXMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

-0.15

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

-0.04

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.00

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

-0.10

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

-0.21

+3.93

TEX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEX and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEXMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

-0.15

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.50

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.94

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.75

-0.65

Drawdowns

TEX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEX drawdown since its inception was -91.96%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEX and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.96%

-69.38%

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.29%

-33.91%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.25%

-33.91%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.25%

-37.15%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.15%

-37.15%

-37.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.44%

-18.07%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.43%

-21.78%

-29.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

15.90%

-5.65%

Volatility

TEX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Terex Corporation (TEX) has a higher volatility of 14.48% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.31%. This indicates that TEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.48%

9.31%

+5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.66%

22.14%

+12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.19%

24.92%

+22.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.13%

26.59%

+17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.16%

27.03%

+18.13%

Dividends

TEX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

TEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than MSFT's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
TEX
Terex Corporation
1.11%1.27%1.47%1.11%1.22%1.09%0.34%1.48%1.45%0.66%0.89%1.30%

Financials

TEX vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Terex Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
1.73B
82.89B
(TEX) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TEX vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Terex Corporation and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
11.9%
67.6%
Portfolio components
TEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Terex Corporation reported a gross profit of 206.00M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Terex Corporation reported an operating income of -82.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

TEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Terex Corporation reported a net income of -89.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEX has higher volatility (14.48%) compared to MSFT (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEX dropped -91.96% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

TEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEX and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer