PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECL vs. ROM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECL vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECL achieves a 132.84% return, which is significantly higher than ROM's 81.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TECL has outperformed ROM with an annualized return of 54.96%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively lower 42.99% annualized return.


TECL

1D
3.64%
1M
79.01%
YTD
132.84%
6M
126.90%
1Y
296.16%
3Y*
82.48%
5Y*
45.92%
10Y*
54.96%

ROM

1D
2.56%
1M
48.54%
YTD
81.36%
6M
78.65%
1Y
164.67%
3Y*
60.32%
5Y*
33.27%
10Y*
42.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECL vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
132.84%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
81.36%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TECL and ROM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008

0.98

The correlation between TECL and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

TECL vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TECL
ROM

Technology

20.4%
55.2%

Energy

0.0%
0.1%

Industrials

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TECL
20.4%
ROM
55.2%

Energy

TECL
0.0%
ROM
0.1%

Industrials

TECL
0.0%
ROM
0.0%

Basic Materials

TECL

-

ROM

-

Communication Services

TECL

-

ROM

-

Consumer Cyclical

TECL

-

ROM

-

Consumer Defensive

TECL

-

ROM

-

Financial Services

TECL

-

ROM
3.0%

Healthcare

TECL

-

ROM

-

Real Estate

TECL

-

ROM

-

Utilities

TECL

-

ROM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECL vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECL vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECLROMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.81

3.97

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

3.87

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.58

5.24

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.93

16.06

+2.87

TECL vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECL Sharpe Ratio is 4.81, which is comparable to the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECL and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECLROMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81

3.97

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.87

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.54

+0.23

Drawdowns

TECL vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECL drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECL and ROM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECLROMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.96%

-83.36%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.58%

-32.33%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

-48.10%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

-67.55%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

-67.55%

-10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-20.88%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.19%

10.55%

+5.64%

Volatility

TECL vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a higher volatility of 19.99% compared to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) at 13.54%. This indicates that TECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECLROMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.99%

13.54%

+6.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.69%

33.27%

+16.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.10%

41.78%

+20.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.09%

51.63%

+22.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.35%

49.82%

+22.53%

TECL vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECL has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ROM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECL vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than ROM's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.13%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.05%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TECL and ROM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TECL has higher volatility (19.99%) compared to ROM (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECL dropped -77.96% vs ROM's -83.36%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 54.96% vs 42.99% for ROM. On fees, ROM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 13.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 54.96% return vs 42.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TECL.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.13% for ROM.

TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for TECL and 0.95% for ROM.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.81 vs 3.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECL and ROM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer