PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TEAM vs. PRGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TEAM and PRGS is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

TEAM vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
43.75%
12.69%
TEAM
PRGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TEAM:

0.14

PRGS:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

TEAM:

0.51

PRGS:

1.10

Omega Ratio

TEAM:

1.07

PRGS:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

TEAM:

0.09

PRGS:

0.59

Martin Ratio

TEAM:

0.24

PRGS:

1.38

Ulcer Index

TEAM:

27.26%

PRGS:

8.96%

Daily Std Dev

TEAM:

46.86%

PRGS:

26.07%

Max Drawdown

TEAM:

-74.61%

PRGS:

-67.33%

Current Drawdown

TEAM:

-44.92%

PRGS:

-9.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TEAM:

$65.72B

PRGS:

$2.70B

EPS

TEAM:

-$1.51

PRGS:

$1.86

PEG Ratio

TEAM:

3.82

PRGS:

5.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAM:

$3.51B

PRGS:

$538.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAM:

$2.85B

PRGS:

$410.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAM:

$18.18M

PRGS:

$185.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than PRGS's -3.39% return.


TEAM

YTD

3.69%

1M

0.87%

6M

42.98%

1Y

5.40%

5Y*

13.73%

10Y*

N/A

PRGS

YTD

-3.39%

1M

-4.95%

6M

13.67%

1Y

9.91%

5Y*

6.58%

10Y*

10.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TEAM vs. PRGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TEAM is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TEAM is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TEAM is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TEAM is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRGS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRGS is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRGS is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRGS is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRGS is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRGS is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TEAM vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TEAM, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.140.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for TEAM, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.511.10
The chart of Omega ratio for TEAM, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.071.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for TEAM, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.090.59
The chart of Martin ratio for TEAM, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.241.38
TEAM
PRGS

The current TEAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the PRGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAM and PRGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.14
0.48
TEAM
PRGS

Dividends

TEAM vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison

TEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.83%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%

Drawdowns

TEAM vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than PRGS's maximum drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and PRGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-44.92%
-9.94%
TEAM
PRGS

Volatility

TEAM vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison

Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) has a higher volatility of 12.11% compared to Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) at 5.74%. This indicates that TEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.11%
5.74%
TEAM
PRGS

Financials

TEAM vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab