PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAM vs. PRGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

TEAM vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEAM vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
-57.91%-33.38%2.32%84.85%-66.25%63.04%94.34%35.24%95.47%89.04%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
-40.29%-34.06%21.16%8.94%6.05%8.44%10.64%18.95%-15.41%35.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TEAM:

$17.98B

PRGS:

$1.10B

EPS

TEAM:

-$0.72

PRGS:

$1.95

PS Ratio

TEAM:

3.12

PRGS:

1.13

PB Ratio

TEAM:

11.30

PRGS:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAM:

$5.76B

PRGS:

$987.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAM:

$4.81B

PRGS:

$802.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAM:

-$92.45M

PRGS:

$136.06M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a -57.91% return, which is significantly lower than PRGS's -40.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TEAM has outperformed PRGS with an annualized return of 11.16%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return.


TEAM

1D
2.05%
1M
-9.16%
YTD
-57.91%
6M
-57.26%
1Y
-67.84%
3Y*
-26.40%
5Y*
-21.09%
10Y*
11.16%

PRGS

1D
-9.27%
1M
-38.75%
YTD
-40.29%
6M
-41.61%
1Y
-50.20%
3Y*
-23.09%
5Y*
-9.80%
10Y*
1.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAM vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAM
TEAM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGS
PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAM vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEAMPRGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.29

-1.13

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.38

-1.73

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

0.78

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.83

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.95

-1.66

-0.29

TEAM vs. PRGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEAM Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is comparable to the PRGS Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAM and PRGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEAMPRGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.29

-1.13

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

-0.31

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.04

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.15

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between TEAM and PRGS is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TEAM vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEAM nor PRGS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%

Drawdowns

TEAM vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -85.79%, which is greater than PRGS's maximum drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and PRGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAMPRGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.79%

-67.33%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.67%

-60.33%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.79%

-63.30%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.79%

-63.30%

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.10%

-63.30%

-21.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.80%

-23.37%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.20%

30.14%

+5.06%

Volatility

TEAM vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison

Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) have volatilities of 17.11% and 16.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEAMPRGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.11%

16.79%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.75%

36.11%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.95%

44.66%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.70%

31.76%

+25.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.88%

32.29%

+17.59%

Financials

TEAM vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.59B
247.80M
(TEAM) Total Revenue
(PRGS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TEAM vs. PRGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Progress Software Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%81.0%82.0%83.0%84.0%85.0%86.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
85.0%
82.3%
Portfolio components
TEAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 1.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.

PRGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.94M and revenue of 247.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.3%.

TEAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported an operating income of -47.75M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.0%.

PRGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported an operating income of 46.47M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

TEAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a net income of -42.65M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

PRGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a net income of 22.81M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.