TEAM vs. PRGS
TEAM (Atlassian Corporation Plc) and PRGS (Progress Software Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, TEAM returned 11.93%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for PRGS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEAM vs. PRGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a -50.68% return, which is significantly lower than PRGS's -35.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TEAM has outperformed PRGS with an annualized return of 11.93%, while PRGS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return.
TEAM
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- -50.68%
- 6M
- -51.38%
- 1Y
- -57.81%
- 3Y*
- -21.04%
- 5Y*
- -21.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
PRGS
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- YTD
- -35.61%
- 6M
- -35.67%
- 1Y
- -55.79%
- 3Y*
- -20.09%
- 5Y*
- -8.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
TEAM vs. PRGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM Atlassian Corporation Plc | -50.68% | -33.38% | 2.32% | 84.85% | -66.25% | 63.04% | 94.34% | 35.24% | 95.47% | 89.04% |
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | -35.61% | -34.06% | 21.16% | 8.94% | 6.05% | 8.44% | 10.64% | 18.95% | -15.41% | 35.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEAM and PRGS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
TEAM:
$21.00B
PRGS:
$1.18B
TEAM:
-$0.82
PRGS:
$1.95
TEAM:
3.40
PRGS:
1.22
TEAM:
23.89
PRGS:
2.37
TEAM:
$6.19B
PRGS:
$987.62M
TEAM:
$5.20B
PRGS:
$802.40M
TEAM:
-$227.46M
PRGS:
$136.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEAM vs. PRGS — Risk / Return Rank
TEAM
PRGS
TEAM vs. PRGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEAM | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.78 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.91 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.41 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEAM vs. PRGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than PRGS's maximum drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and PRGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEAM | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.53% | -67.33% | -20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.13% | -61.14% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.30% | -64.10% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.53% | -64.10% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.53% | -64.10% | -23.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.55% | -60.42% | -22.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.92% | -23.59% | -6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.53% | 39.54% | +4.99% |
Volatility
TEAM vs. PRGS - Volatility Comparison
Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) has a higher volatility of 23.52% compared to Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) at 16.35%. This indicates that TEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEAM | PRGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.52% | 16.35% | +7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.26% | 42.40% | +12.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 49.60% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.72% | 33.61% | +27.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.67% | 33.28% | +18.39% |
Dividends
TEAM vs. PRGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TEAM nor PRGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 1.29% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.21% | 0.39% |
TEAM Atlassian Corporation Plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TEAM vs. PRGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Progress Software Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEAM vs. PRGS - Profitability Comparison
TEAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 1.52B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.
PRGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.94M and revenue of 247.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.3%.
TEAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported an operating income of -55.27M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.
PRGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported an operating income of 46.47M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
TEAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a net income of -98.39M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.
PRGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a net income of 22.81M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEAM and PRGS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEAM has higher volatility (23.52%) compared to PRGS (16.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEAM dropped -87.53% vs PRGS's -67.33%.
TEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEAM and PRGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer