TDY vs. CASY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) and Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).

Performance

TDY vs. CASY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) and Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TDY vs. CASY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated	21.00%	10.04%	4.00%	11.60%	-8.46%	11.46%	13.11%	67.35%	14.31%	47.28%
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc.	33.50%	40.12%	45.01%	23.27%	14.49%	11.25%	13.24%	25.12%	15.59%	-4.99%

Fundamentals

EPS TDY : $17.23 CASY : $17.42
PE Ratio TDY : 35.86 CASY : 42.32
PEG Ratio TDY : 2.32 CASY : 2.77
PS Ratio TDY : 4.88 CASY : 1.62
Total Revenue (TTM) TDY : $6.01B CASY : $16.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) TDY : $2.57B CASY : $3.05B
EBITDA (TTM) TDY : $1.40B CASY : $1.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDY achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly lower than CASY's 33.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TDY having a 21.39% annualized return and CASY not far behind at 21.37%.

TDY

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -10.26%
• YTD: 21.00%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 11.37%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: 21.39%

CASY

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 7.30%
• YTD: 33.50%
• 6M: 32.10%
• 1Y: 68.00%
• 3Y*: 51.25%
• 5Y*: 28.50%
• 10Y*: 21.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TDY vs. CASY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDY

TDY Risk / Return Rank: 68
TDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TDY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TDY Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CASY

CASY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CASY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CASY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CASY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CASY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CASY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDY vs. CASY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) and Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDY	CASY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.55	-1.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.58	-2.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.47	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	7.45	-6.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	21.84	-18.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDY vs. CASY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the CASY Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDY and CASY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDY	CASY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	2.55	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	1.10	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.78	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.51	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between TDY and CASY is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TDY vs. CASY - Dividend Comparison

TDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CASY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc.	0.30%	0.39%	0.47%	0.59%	0.65%	0.69%	0.72%	0.77%	0.86%	0.89%	0.77%	0.70%

Drawdowns

TDY vs. CASY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDY drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, smaller than the maximum CASY drawdown of -74.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDY and CASY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDY	CASY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.17%	-74.32%	+8.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-9.47%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.24%	-23.64%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.95%	-33.41%	-15.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.26%	0.00%	-10.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.51%	-15.20%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.47%	3.23%	+4.24%

Volatility

TDY vs. CASY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is 8.30%, while Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that TDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDY	CASY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.30%	9.30%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.48%	17.35%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.93%	26.86%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.10%	26.05%	-1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.54%	27.40%	+0.14%

Financials

TDY vs. CASY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teledyne Technologies Incorporated and Casey's General Stores, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 659.50M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

CASY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 282.80M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CASY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 220.70M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

CASY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 130.07M and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.