PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDVG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.


TDVG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.06%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.57%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
7.48%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%26.20%12.98%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%13.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and SPHD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.71

The correlation between TDVG and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDVG vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDVG
SPHD

Technology

24.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

19.5%
15.6%

Industrials

13.6%
0.0%

Healthcare

12.9%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
17.8%

Energy

5.8%
14.1%

Utilities

3.9%
13.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%

-

Real Estate

1.6%
20.1%

Communication Services

1.2%
8.6%

Technology

TDVG
24.1%
SPHD
1.5%

Financial Services

TDVG
19.5%
SPHD
15.6%

Industrials

TDVG
13.6%
SPHD
0.0%

Healthcare

TDVG
12.9%
SPHD
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TDVG
7.7%
SPHD
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

TDVG
7.1%
SPHD
17.8%

Energy

TDVG
5.8%
SPHD
14.1%

Utilities

TDVG
3.9%
SPHD
13.7%

Basic Materials

TDVG
2.9%
SPHD

-

Real Estate

TDVG
1.6%
SPHD
20.1%

Communication Services

TDVG
1.2%
SPHD
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.74

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.15

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.11

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.68

2.78

+6.90

TDVG vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.74

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.39

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.58

+0.36

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-41.39%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.33%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-13.29%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-19.50%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-5.37%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-4.70%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.93%

-1.17%

Volatility

TDVG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.11%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVGSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

2.99%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

7.55%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

11.04%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

14.16%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.64%

-3.71%

TDVG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDVG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDVG and SPHD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 5-year performance, TDVG leads with 10.03% vs 5.48% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.

TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHD is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.30% for SPHD.

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDVG and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer