TDTT vs. SCHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ).
TDTT and SCHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDTT is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Government - Treasury - Long. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. Both TDTT and SCHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TDTT or SCHQ.
Key characteristics
| TDTT | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.89% | -4.08% |
| 1Y Return | 6.50% | 7.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.09% | -11.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.32% | -5.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.22 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.64 | 0.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.59 | 0.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.07 | 1.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.46% | 5.31% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.93% | 13.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.97% | -46.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.30% | -38.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDTT and SCHQ is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -4.08% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than SCHQ's 4.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 3.84% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.19% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.45% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.52% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and SCHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TDTT vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) is 0.58%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that TDTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.