PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV.AS vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.51%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-7.12%2.88%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
2.15%-3.68%27.23%19.09%-14.06%18.67%-0.24%25.47%1.48%4.19%
Different Trading Currencies

TDIV.AS is traded in EUR, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 2.15% return.


TDIV.AS

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.51%
6M
17.61%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
2.15%
6M
8.98%
1Y
8.57%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIV.ASQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

0.46

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

0.77

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.84

0.79

+8.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.24

2.60

+24.64

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.AS and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIV.ASQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.46

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.46

0.48

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.AS and QYLD is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than QYLD's 11.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.32%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.85%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Drawdowns

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and QYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIV.ASQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-24.75%

-11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.90%

-10.84%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-24.61%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.84%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-3.89%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.65%

-0.34%

Volatility

TDIV.AS vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) is 3.24%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that TDIV.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDIV.ASQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

4.06%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

8.10%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

18.78%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

15.48%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

16.68%

-2.28%