TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L).
TDIV.AS and MLPD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDIV.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. MLPD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on May 15, 2013. Both TDIV.AS and MLPD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TDIV.AS or MLPD.L.
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV.AS and MLPD.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TDIV.AS:
2.41
MLPD.L:
1.83
TDIV.AS:
3.09
MLPD.L:
2.48
TDIV.AS:
1.44
MLPD.L:
1.31
TDIV.AS:
3.48
MLPD.L:
2.57
TDIV.AS:
14.70
MLPD.L:
8.93
TDIV.AS:
1.68%
MLPD.L:
2.95%
TDIV.AS:
10.25%
MLPD.L:
14.37%
TDIV.AS:
-36.06%
MLPD.L:
-82.22%
TDIV.AS:
0.00%
MLPD.L:
-0.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD.L's 10.12% return.
TDIV.AS
8.61%
4.39%
15.19%
23.84%
12.55%
N/A
MLPD.L
10.12%
2.07%
15.97%
26.04%
16.67%
2.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TDIV.AS
MLPD.L
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison
TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than MLPD.L's 7.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.85% | 4.19% | 4.98% | 4.55% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 4.93% | 3.95% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.42% | 8.18% | 8.60% | 7.98% | 8.57% | 11.03% | 10.06% | 9.87% | 8.15% | 8.14% | 9.96% | 6.55% |
Drawdowns
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and MLPD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TDIV.AS vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) is 2.96%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that TDIV.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.