TDC vs. MET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Teradata Corporation (TDC) and MetLife, Inc. (MET).

Performance

TDC vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradata Corporation (TDC) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TDC vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TDC Teradata Corporation	-15.80%	-2.28%	-28.41%	29.26%	-20.74%	89.01%	-16.06%	-30.21%	-0.26%	41.55%
MET MetLife, Inc.	-9.77%	-0.80%	27.68%	-5.49%	19.23%	37.43%	-3.42%	28.84%	-15.77%	21.67%

Fundamentals

EPS TDC : $1.35 MET : $7.54
PE Ratio TDC : 18.92 MET : 9.38
PEG Ratio TDC : 0.61 MET : 0.22
PS Ratio TDC : 1.48 MET : 0.42
Total Revenue (TTM) TDC : $1.66B MET : $76.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) TDC : $989.00M MET : $12.20B
EBITDA (TTM) TDC : $266.00M MET : $4.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDC achieves a -15.80% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TDC has underperformed MET with an annualized return of -0.01%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.

TDC

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -18.61%
• YTD: -15.80%
• 6M: 19.15%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: -13.99%
• 5Y*: -8.02%
• 10Y*: -0.01%

MET

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -12.90%
• 1Y: -9.30%
• 3Y*: 10.23%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TDC vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDC

TDC Risk / Return Rank: 52
TDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TDC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TDC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MET

MET Risk / Return Rank: 25
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDC vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradata Corporation (TDC) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDC	MET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	-0.33	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	-0.26	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.96	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	-0.46	+0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	-1.15	+2.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDC vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the MET Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDC and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDC	MET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	-0.33	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.23	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	0.35	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.24	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between TDC and MET is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TDC vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

TDC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TDC Teradata Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MET MetLife, Inc.	3.21%	2.85%	2.63%	3.12%	2.74%	3.04%	3.88%	3.41%	4.04%	14.52%	2.92%	3.06%

Drawdowns

TDC vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDC drawdown since its inception was -75.50%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDC and MET.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDC	MET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.50%	-82.37%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.66%	-17.46%	-17.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.40%	-35.09%	-32.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.40%	-55.16%	-12.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.40%	-16.95%	-48.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.68%	-17.71%	-22.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.78%	7.03%	+4.75%

Volatility

TDC vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

Teradata Corporation (TDC) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.49%. This indicates that TDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDC	MET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	6.49%	+3.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.26%	17.81%	+31.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.77%	28.54%	+31.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.39%	25.68%	+21.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.14%	30.74%	+14.40%

Financials

TDC vs. MET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradata Corporation and MetLife, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradata Corporation reported a gross profit of 256.00M and revenue of 421.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradata Corporation reported an operating income of 52.00M and revenue of 421.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradata Corporation reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 421.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 809.00M and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.