PortfoliosLab logo
TDC vs. MET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TDC and MET is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TDC vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradata Corporation (TDC) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TDC:

-0.75

MET:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

TDC:

-0.78

MET:

0.74

Omega Ratio

TDC:

0.86

MET:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

TDC:

-0.42

MET:

0.57

Martin Ratio

TDC:

-1.51

MET:

1.81

Ulcer Index

TDC:

20.76%

MET:

6.88%

Daily Std Dev

TDC:

42.39%

MET:

29.19%

Max Drawdown

TDC:

-75.50%

MET:

-82.93%

Current Drawdown

TDC:

-69.65%

MET:

-10.55%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TDC:

$2.12B

MET:

$51.97B

EPS

TDC:

$1.16

MET:

$6.12

PE Ratio

TDC:

19.05

MET:

12.65

PEG Ratio

TDC:

3.35

MET:

1.06

PS Ratio

TDC:

1.21

MET:

0.71

PB Ratio

TDC:

15.94

MET:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

TDC:

$1.70B

MET:

$72.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TDC:

$1.02B

MET:

$72.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

TDC:

$231.00M

MET:

$6.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDC achieves a -27.83% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TDC has underperformed MET with an annualized return of -5.61%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 7.97% annualized return.


TDC

YTD

-27.83%

1M

4.17%

6M

-24.79%

1Y

-31.63%

5Y*

-0.95%

10Y*

-5.61%

MET

YTD

-3.60%

1M

4.24%

6M

-2.57%

1Y

10.48%

5Y*

21.15%

10Y*

7.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TDC vs. MET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TDC is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TDC is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TDC is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TDC is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TDC is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TDC is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MET is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MET is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MET is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MET is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MET is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MET is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TDC vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradata Corporation (TDC) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MET Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDC and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TDC vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

TDC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TDC
Teradata Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.47%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.85%2.65%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TDC vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDC drawdown since its inception was -75.50%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDC and MET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TDC vs. MET - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

TDC vs. MET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradata Corporation and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
418.00M
18.28B
(TDC) Total Revenue
(MET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TDC vs. MET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradata Corporation and MetLife, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
59.3%
100.0%
(TDC) Gross Margin
(MET) Gross Margin
TDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradata Corporation reported a gross profit of 248.00M and revenue of 418.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.28B and revenue of 18.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

TDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradata Corporation reported an operating income of 66.00M and revenue of 418.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

TDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradata Corporation reported a net income of 44.00M and revenue of 418.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 945.00M and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.