TCPC vs. PFLT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT).
Performance
TCPC vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCPC vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCPC BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. | -30.77% | -26.24% | -12.26% | 3.23% | 5.61% | 30.76% | -9.17% | 19.31% | -5.59% | -1.22% |
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | -10.16% | -4.17% | 0.62% | 23.05% | -5.53% | 32.64% | -1.41% | 15.52% | -8.29% | 5.49% |
Fundamentals
TCPC:
$1.29
PFLT:
$0.63
TCPC:
2.79
PFLT:
12.74
TCPC:
0.09
PFLT:
0.07
TCPC:
2.77
PFLT:
3.25
TCPC:
$110.78M
PFLT:
$149.03M
TCPC:
$58.19M
PFLT:
$48.69M
TCPC:
$129.18M
PFLT:
$39.60M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCPC achieves a -30.77% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TCPC has underperformed PFLT with an annualized return of -2.38%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.52% annualized return.
TCPC
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- YTD
- -30.77%
- 6M
- -36.20%
- 1Y
- -46.47%
- 3Y*
- -17.42%
- 5Y*
- -12.93%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
PFLT
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- -10.16%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- -18.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCPC vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank
TCPC
PFLT
TCPC vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCPC | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | -0.78 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | -0.94 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.87 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.86 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.02 | -1.73 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCPC | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.33 | -0.78 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.51 | 0.13 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.23 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.24 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCPC and PFLT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TCPC vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison
TCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.70%, more than PFLT's 15.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCPC BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. | 27.70% | 20.48% | 16.76% | 14.64% | 9.81% | 8.88% | 11.74% | 10.25% | 11.04% | 9.42% | 8.52% | 10.34% |
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 15.30% | 13.27% | 11.25% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.24% | 9.59% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% |
Drawdowns
TCPC vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCPC drawdown since its inception was -69.08%, roughly equal to the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPC and PFLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCPC | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.08% | -69.77% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.21% | -21.90% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.91% | -29.64% | -29.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.08% | -69.77% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.88% | -19.87% | -37.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -8.00% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.89% | 10.93% | +11.96% |
Volatility
TCPC vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 7.54%. This indicates that TCPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCPC | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.76% | 7.54% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.01% | 15.41% | +11.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.98% | 23.55% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 20.93% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 28.81% | +5.26% |
Financials
TCPC vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities