PortfoliosLab logo
TCPC vs. PFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TCPC and PFLT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TCPC vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TCPC:

-0.70

PFLT:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

TCPC:

-0.78

PFLT:

-0.06

Omega Ratio

TCPC:

0.89

PFLT:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

TCPC:

-0.56

PFLT:

-0.15

Martin Ratio

TCPC:

-1.16

PFLT:

-0.52

Ulcer Index

TCPC:

18.05%

PFLT:

5.83%

Daily Std Dev

TCPC:

31.37%

PFLT:

20.33%

Max Drawdown

TCPC:

-69.08%

PFLT:

-69.77%

Current Drawdown

TCPC:

-29.88%

PFLT:

-10.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCPC:

$612.56M

PFLT:

$886.60M

EPS

TCPC:

-$0.79

PFLT:

$1.37

PEG Ratio

TCPC:

0.88

PFLT:

0.27

PS Ratio

TCPC:

2.36

PFLT:

4.12

PB Ratio

TCPC:

0.72

PFLT:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCPC:

$109.08M

PFLT:

$110.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCPC:

$107.81M

PFLT:

$133.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

TCPC:

-$9.26M

PFLT:

$84.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCPC achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TCPC has underperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 2.79%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.77% annualized return.


TCPC

YTD

-14.70%

1M

7.46%

6M

-10.91%

1Y

-22.28%

5Y*

8.82%

10Y*

2.79%

PFLT

YTD

-4.14%

1M

7.02%

6M

-6.20%

1Y

-2.17%

5Y*

20.23%

10Y*

6.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TCPC vs. PFLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TCPC is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TCPC is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TCPC is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TCPC is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TCPC is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TCPC is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFLT is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TCPC vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TCPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCPC and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TCPC vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

TCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.64%, more than PFLT's 12.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TCPC
BlackRock TCP Capital Corp.
17.64%15.61%11.70%9.81%8.88%11.74%10.25%11.04%9.42%8.52%10.34%9.18%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
12.20%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%

Drawdowns

TCPC vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCPC drawdown since its inception was -69.08%, roughly equal to the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPC and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TCPC vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (TCPC) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 7.19%. This indicates that TCPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TCPC vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-40.00M-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
-33.38M
30.01M
(TCPC) Total Revenue
(PFLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items