TCLHF vs. ASMIY
TCLHF (TCL Electronics Holdings Limited) and ASMIY (ASM International NV ADR) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TCLHF in Consumer Electronics, ASMIY in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, TCLHF returned 13.59%/yr vs 42.58%/yr for ASMIY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLHF achieves a 32.40% return, which is significantly lower than ASMIY's 88.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLHF has underperformed ASMIY with an annualized return of 13.59%, while ASMIY has yielded a comparatively higher 42.58% annualized return.
TCLHF
- 1D
- 8.43%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- 32.40%
- 6M
- 33.83%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
ASMIY
- 1D
- -9.07%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 88.06%
- 6M
- 86.90%
- 1Y
- 87.37%
- 3Y*
- 40.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.49%
- 10Y*
- 42.58%
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLHF TCL Electronics Holdings Limited | 32.40% | 74.10% | 167.22% | -19.67% | -21.86% | -32.28% | 71.60% | 28.57% | -21.02% | 1.03% |
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR | 88.06% | 6.62% | 10.11% | 105.57% | -42.49% | 109.33% | 94.36% | 196.39% | -36.06% | 55.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLHF and ASMIY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
TCLHF:
$4.54B
ASMIY:
$55.52B
TCLHF:
HK$1.21
ASMIY:
€20.11
TCLHF:
11.69
ASMIY:
49.43
TCLHF:
0.27
ASMIY:
3.17
TCLHF:
0.25
ASMIY:
15.33
TCLHF:
1.85
ASMIY:
11.38
TCLHF:
HK$141.48B
ASMIY:
€3.19B
TCLHF:
HK$21.80B
ASMIY:
€1.65B
TCLHF:
HK$4.46B
ASMIY:
€1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCLHF vs. ASMIY — Risk / Return Rank
TCLHF
ASMIY
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCL Electronics Holdings Limited (TCLHF) and ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCLHF | ASMIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.24 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 7.91 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLHF drawdown since its inception was -92.31%, which is greater than ASMIY's maximum drawdown of -58.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLHF and ASMIY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLHF | ASMIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.31% | -58.10% | -34.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -27.14% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.26% | -53.17% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -58.10% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.25% | -58.10% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -9.07% | -5.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.62% | -15.70% | -27.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 11.08% | +1.63% |
Volatility
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Volatility Comparison
TCL Electronics Holdings Limited (TCLHF) has a higher volatility of 23.52% compared to ASM International NV ADR (ASMIY) at 18.90%. This indicates that TCLHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASMIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCLHF | ASMIY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.52% | 18.90% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.92% | 36.65% | +33.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.24% | 46.65% | +51.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.80% | 47.07% | +28.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.96% | 43.36% | +23.60% |
Dividends
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Dividend Comparison
TCLHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than ASMIY's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMIY ASM International NV ADR | 0.33% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.52% | 1.08% | 0.54% | 0.85% | 1.83% | 14.04% | 0.99% | 1.52% |
TCLHF TCL Electronics Holdings Limited | 2.28% | 3.02% | 2.48% | 5.16% | 0.00% | 2.94% | 3.51% | 5.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TCL Electronics Holdings Limited and ASM International NV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TCLHF vs. ASMIY - Profitability Comparison
TCLHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 9.53B and revenue of 59.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.
ASMIY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a gross profit of 459.90M and revenue of 862.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.
TCLHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 59.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
ASMIY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported an operating income of 278.20M and revenue of 862.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
TCLHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 59.79B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
ASMIY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASM International NV ADR reported a net income of 238.50M and revenue of 862.50M, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TCLHF and ASMIY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCLHF has higher volatility (23.52%) compared to ASMIY (18.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLHF dropped -92.31% vs ASMIY's -58.10%.
ASMIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCLHF and ASMIY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer