TCHP vs. FXL
TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) and FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index. TCHP is actively managed, while FXL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TCHP returned 11.66%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for FXL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCHP charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FXL.
Performance
TCHP vs. FXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than FXL's 31.98% return.
TCHP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
TCHP vs. FXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 3.99% | 18.40% | 36.06% | 50.10% | -37.81% | 18.08% | 11.37% |
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHP and FXL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TCHP and FXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TCHP vs. FXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCHP
FXL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TCHP
FXL
Consumer Cyclical
TCHP
FXL
Communication Services
TCHP
FXL
Financial Services
TCHP
FXL
Healthcare
TCHP
FXL
-
Industrials
TCHP
FXL
Consumer Defensive
TCHP
FXL
-
Basic Materials
TCHP
FXL
-
Utilities
TCHP
FXL
-
Energy
TCHP
-
FXL
-
Real Estate
TCHP
-
FXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHP vs. FXL — Risk / Return Rank
TCHP
FXL
TCHP vs. FXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCHP | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.56 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 11.95 | -8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCHP | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.16 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
TCHP vs. FXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum FXL drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and FXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHP | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -61.41% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -13.56% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -28.27% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -38.49% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.88% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -11.37% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 4.03% | +1.20% |
Volatility
TCHP vs. FXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is 3.84%, while First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that TCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHP | FXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 7.61% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 17.47% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 22.42% | -6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 25.12% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 25.28% | -2.10% |
TCHP vs. FXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FXL's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHP vs. FXL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TCHP nor FXL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHP and FXL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to TCHP (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs FXL's -61.41%.
On 5-year performance, FXL leads with 13.48% vs 11.66% for TCHP. On fees, TCHP is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, TCHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXL has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCHP is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
TCHP and FXL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FXL is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.61% for FXL.
FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCHP and FXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer