TCBK vs. LAND
TCBK (TriCo Bancshares) and LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) are both stocks. TCBK operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while LAND operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, TCBK returned 11.31%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LAND. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TCBK vs. LAND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCBK achieves a 23.26% return, which is significantly higher than LAND's -8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TCBK has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 11.31%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 0.68% annualized return.
TCBK
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- YTD
- 23.26%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
LAND
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -5.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.98M | $4.95M | $5.67M | |
TCBK TriCo Bancshares | $23.26M | $33.89M | $16.51M |
TCBK vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCBK TriCo Bancshares | 23.26% | 11.87% | 5.08% | -13.03% | 21.55% | 24.53% | -10.98% | 23.39% | -9.10% | 12.77% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -8.31% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCBK and LAND is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.27 |
The correlation between TCBK and LAND shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TCBK:
$1.85B
LAND:
$349.84M
TCBK:
$4.17
LAND:
-$0.31
TCBK:
3.42
LAND:
3.56
TCBK:
1.37
LAND:
0.48
TCBK:
$545.80M
LAND:
$86.33M
TCBK:
$426.85M
LAND:
$12.83M
TCBK:
$198.44M
LAND:
$64.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCBK vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank
TCBK
LAND
TCBK vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCBK | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.98 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | -0.19 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | -0.42 | +10.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCBK vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCBK drawdown since its inception was -67.14%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCBK and LAND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCBK | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.14% | -76.56% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -33.48% | +21.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | -44.15% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | -76.56% | +27.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.83% | -76.56% | +27.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.62% | -76.56% | +69.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -31.14% | +12.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 15.37% | -10.87% |
Volatility
TCBK vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) at 5.82%. This indicates that TCBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCBK | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.29% | 5.82% | +7.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.09% | 21.23% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.38% | 27.34% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.24% | 31.33% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 29.96% | +1.92% |
Dividends
TCBK vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison
TCBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than LAND's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.91% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
TCBK TriCo Bancshares | 2.50% | 2.91% | 3.02% | 2.79% | 2.16% | 2.33% | 2.49% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 1.74% | 1.76% | 1.90% |
Financials
TCBK vs. LAND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TriCo Bancshares and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TCBK vs. LAND - Profitability Comparison
TCBK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriCo Bancshares reported a gross profit of 107.52M and revenue of 137.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
LAND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.
TCBK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriCo Bancshares reported an operating income of 46.30M and revenue of 137.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.
LAND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.
TCBK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriCo Bancshares reported a net income of 34.17M and revenue of 137.53M, resulting in a net margin of 24.8%.
LAND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TCBK and LAND have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCBK has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to LAND (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCBK dropped -67.14% vs LAND's -76.56%.
TCBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCBK and LAND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer