PortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and SCHG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TCAF vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

TCAF:

11.62%

SCHG:

24.88%

Max Drawdown

TCAF:

-0.87%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

TCAF:

-0.09%

SCHG:

-10.70%

Returns By Period


TCAF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-6.76%

1M

6.57%

6M

-6.25%

1Y

12.24%

5Y*

18.28%

10Y*

15.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCAF vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TCAF vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TCAF is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TCAF is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TCAF is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TCAF vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

TCAF vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SCHG's 0.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TCAF vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...