PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLL vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLL vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBLL having a 1.43% return and BIL slightly higher at 1.49%.


TBLL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLL vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
1.43%4.21%5.11%5.01%1.11%-0.01%0.93%2.20%1.85%0.62%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLL and BIL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017

0.33

The correlation between TBLL and BIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLL vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLL
TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLL vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLLBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+44.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

102.92

87.91

+15.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

416.84

355.35

+61.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3,533.11

2,817.77

+715.34

TBLL vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLL Sharpe Ratio is 20.94, which is comparable to the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLL and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLLBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.94

19.71

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

7.53

13.16

-5.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.26

2.78

+1.48

Drawdowns

TBLL vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLLBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-0.78%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-0.01%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.36%

-0.01%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-0.10%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-0.26%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

TBLL vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) have volatilities of 0.05% and 0.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLLBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.05%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

0.13%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19%

0.20%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.45%

0.26%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.56%

0.26%

+0.30%

TBLL vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLL vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
3.81%4.08%4.99%4.63%1.37%0.03%0.80%2.08%1.69%0.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLL and BIL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIL has higher volatility (0.05%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 5-year performance, BIL leads with 3.41% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BIL has performed better with a 3.41% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.81% for TBLL.

TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BIL is Government Bonds. TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.14% for BIL.

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 19.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLL and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer