PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBB vs. TBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBB vs. TBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TBB

1D
-1.00%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-3.94%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
0.95%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

TBC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBB vs. TBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
-3.94%-3.34%10.14%14.65%-12.18%-0.72%7.21%26.60%-8.67%
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d
0.00%0.00%6.59%15.83%-11.61%1.65%7.53%25.45%-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TBB and TBC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.68

The correlation between TBB and TBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

TBB:

$3.04

TBC:

$3.05

PE Ratio

TBB:

6.82

TBC:

8.20

PEG Ratio

TBB:

0.28

TBC:

0.33

PS Ratio

TBB:

1.19

TBC:

1.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBB:

$125.65B

TBC:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBB:

$105.41B

TBC:

$100.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

TBB:

$54.70B

TBC:

$36.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBB vs. TBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBB
TBB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TBC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBB vs. TBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) and AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d (TBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBBTBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

TBB vs. TBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBBTBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Drawdowns

TBB vs. TBC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBBTBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

Volatility

TBB vs. TBC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBBTBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

Dividends

TBB vs. TBC - Dividend Comparison

TBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, while TBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
6.44%6.01%5.48%5.70%6.17%5.13%3.63%4.99%6.07%
TBC
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d
0.00%0.00%5.63%5.68%6.20%5.18%5.00%5.11%1.52%

Financials

TBB vs. TBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 and AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.47B
33.47B
(TBB) Total Revenue
(TBC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TBB and TBC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBB and TBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer