PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAP vs. TDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TAP vs. TDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAP achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than TDG's -5.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TAP has underperformed TDG with an annualized return of -6.07%, while TDG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.90% annualized return.


TAP

1D
0.02%
1M
4.47%
6M
-11.55%
YTD
-8.97%
1Y
-10.10%
3Y*
-11.53%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
-6.07%
ALL TIME*
7.40%

TDG

1D
0.36%
1M
-6.98%
6M
-12.13%
YTD
-5.68%
1Y
-15.42%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
21.90%
ALL TIME*
27.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$124.45M$126.91M$132.78M
$415.00M$410.74M$481.88M

TAP vs. TDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
-8.97%-15.53%-3.43%22.15%14.39%4.12%-15.20%-0.44%-29.88%-14.11%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-5.68%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%10.51%84.41%23.83%19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TAP and TDG is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between TAP and TDG has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TAP:

$7.79B

TDG:

$70.16B

EPS

TAP:

-$10.85

TDG:

$34.78

PS Ratio

TAP:

0.72

TDG:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

TAP:

$11.19B

TDG:

$9.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TAP:

$4.23B

TDG:

$5.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

TAP:

-$1.54B

TDG:

$4.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAP vs. TDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAP
TAP Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAP vs. TDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAPTDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.92

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-0.68

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

-1.09

+0.40

TAP vs. TDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAP Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is comparable to the TDG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAP and TDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAP vs. TDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAP drawdown since its inception was -67.73%, which is greater than TDG's maximum drawdown of -62.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAP and TDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAPTDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.73%

-62.64%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.75%

-24.75%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.80%

-25.30%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.73%

-25.30%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.73%

-62.64%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.75%

-17.29%

-34.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.89%

-8.00%

-14.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

15.25%

+0.75%

Volatility

TAP vs. TDG - Volatility Comparison

Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) at 9.21%. This indicates that TAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAPTDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

9.21%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

23.26%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.69%

29.58%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

28.02%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.51%

33.93%

-5.42%

Dividends

TAP vs. TDG - Dividend Comparison

TAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than TDG's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
4.57%4.03%3.07%2.68%2.95%1.47%1.26%3.64%2.92%2.00%1.69%1.75%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.17%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%0.00%

Financials

TAP vs. TDG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Molson Coors Brewing Company and TransDigm Group Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TAP vs. TDG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Molson Coors Brewing Company and TransDigm Group Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a gross profit of 897.20M and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

TDG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

TAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported an operating income of 258.30M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

TDG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

TAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a net income of 151.30M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

TDG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAP and TDG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAP has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to TDG (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAP dropped -67.73% vs TDG's -62.64%.

TAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAP and TDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer