TAN vs. SMOG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG).
TAN and SMOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. SMOG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Ardour Global Index. It was launched on May 3, 2007. Both TAN and SMOG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TAN or SMOG.
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and SMOG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TAN vs. SMOG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TAN:
-0.89
SMOG:
-0.37
TAN:
-1.23
SMOG:
-0.37
TAN:
0.87
SMOG:
0.96
TAN:
-0.41
SMOG:
-0.16
TAN:
-1.46
SMOG:
-0.78
TAN:
23.81%
SMOG:
10.12%
TAN:
39.08%
SMOG:
21.26%
TAN:
-95.29%
SMOG:
-84.39%
TAN:
-84.91%
SMOG:
-45.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMOG's -9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TAN has underperformed SMOG with an annualized return of 0.78%, while SMOG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.17% annualized return.
TAN
-38.11%
-2.91%
-24.56%
-34.79%
1.58%
0.78%
SMOG
-9.28%
-0.14%
1.62%
-5.27%
6.65%
7.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAN vs. SMOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOG's 0.63% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TAN vs. SMOG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TAN vs. SMOG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAN nor SMOG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.28% |
SMOG VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF | 0.00% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% | 0.21% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. SMOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than SMOG's maximum drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and SMOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TAN vs. SMOG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) at 5.39%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.