TAN vs. DRIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV).
TAN and DRIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. DRIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. It was launched on Apr 13, 2018. Both TAN and DRIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TAN or DRIV.
Key characteristics
TAN | DRIV | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -32.45% | -3.59% |
1Y Return | -13.20% | 10.74% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -27.86% | -8.27% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.41% | 11.38% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.37 | 0.40 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.28 | 0.70 |
Omega Ratio | 0.97 | 1.08 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.18 | 0.27 |
Martin Ratio | -0.74 | 1.21 |
Ulcer Index | 20.62% | 7.53% |
Daily Std Dev | 41.55% | 22.65% |
Max Drawdown | -95.29% | -39.24% |
Current Drawdown | -83.53% | -23.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and DRIV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TAN vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a -32.45% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's -3.59% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAN vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TAN vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TAN vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
TAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DRIV's 1.72% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco Solar ETF | 0.13% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.28% |
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 1.72% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -39.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and DRIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TAN vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) at 5.90%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.