PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TAN vs. DRIV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TANDRIV
YTD Return-32.45%-3.59%
1Y Return-13.20%10.74%
3Y Return (Ann)-27.86%-8.27%
5Y Return (Ann)5.41%11.38%
Sharpe Ratio-0.370.40
Sortino Ratio-0.280.70
Omega Ratio0.971.08
Calmar Ratio-0.180.27
Martin Ratio-0.741.21
Ulcer Index20.62%7.53%
Daily Std Dev41.55%22.65%
Max Drawdown-95.29%-39.24%
Current Drawdown-83.53%-23.74%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between TAN and DRIV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TAN vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a -32.45% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's -3.59% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.31%
-0.98%
TAN
DRIV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TAN vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
Expense ratio chart for TAN: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for DRIV: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TAN vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TAN, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.74
DRIV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DRIV, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DRIV, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DRIV, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DRIV, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DRIV, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.21

TAN vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAN and DRIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.37
0.40
TAN
DRIV

Dividends

TAN vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

TAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DRIV's 1.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.13%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.70%1.77%5.04%1.60%1.88%1.28%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
1.72%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TAN vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -39.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and DRIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-70.42%
-23.74%
TAN
DRIV

Volatility

TAN vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) at 5.90%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.68%
5.90%
TAN
DRIV