TAN vs. ACES
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES).
TAN and ACES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 15, 2008. ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018. Both TAN and ACES are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TAN or ACES.
Correlation
The correlation between TAN and ACES is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TAN vs. ACES - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TAN:
-0.89
ACES:
-0.87
TAN:
-1.23
ACES:
-1.17
TAN:
0.87
ACES:
0.87
TAN:
-0.41
ACES:
-0.40
TAN:
-1.46
ACES:
-1.42
TAN:
23.81%
ACES:
20.65%
TAN:
39.08%
ACES:
33.84%
TAN:
-95.29%
ACES:
-73.53%
TAN:
-84.91%
ACES:
-73.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than ACES's -28.13% return.
TAN
-38.11%
-2.91%
-24.56%
-34.79%
1.58%
0.78%
ACES
-28.13%
-3.45%
-9.82%
-25.89%
-4.40%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAN vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TAN vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TAN vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison
TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.28% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 1.38% | 1.44% | 1.09% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.30% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TAN vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than ACES's maximum drawdown of -73.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and ACES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TAN vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) at 8.87%. This indicates that TAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.