TAL vs. URNM
TAL (TAL Education Group) is a stock, while URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Over the past 5 years, TAL returned -20.16%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for URNM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TAL vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAL achieves a -10.82% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.
TAL
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- -10.82%
- 6M
- -12.34%
- 1Y
- -5.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- -20.16%
- 10Y*
- 0.56%
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
TAL vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAL TAL Education Group | -10.82% | 8.88% | -20.67% | 79.15% | 79.39% | -94.50% | 48.36% | 8.95% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAL and URNM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAL vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
TAL
URNM
TAL vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TAL Education Group (TAL) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.19 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.65 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 3.59 | -4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 1.03 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.32 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.67 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
TAL vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAL drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAL and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.06% | -50.78% | -47.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.79% | -32.04% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.31% | -50.78% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.37% | -50.78% | -43.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.21% | -26.82% | -62.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.81% | -18.03% | -23.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.45% | 14.71% | -3.26% |
Volatility
TAL vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TAL Education Group (TAL) is 11.07%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that TAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 16.19% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.83% | 40.32% | -6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.89% | 51.69% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.79% | 48.30% | +37.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.33% | 46.90% | +22.43% |
Dividends
TAL vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
TAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAL TAL Education Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 1.28% | 4.07% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAL and URNM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to TAL (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAL dropped -98.06% vs URNM's -50.78%.
URNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAL and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer