TAL vs. MNSO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TAL Education Group (TAL) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO).

Performance

TAL vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TAL Education Group (TAL) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAL vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TAL TAL Education Group	4.22%	8.88%	-20.67%	79.15%	79.39%	-94.50%	-10.62%
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	-13.60%	-18.93%	20.92%	93.11%	6.38%	-60.35%	26.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TAL : $2.13B MNSO : $5.05B
EPS TAL : $1.43 MNSO : $6.93
PE Ratio TAL : 7.95 MNSO : 2.34
PEG Ratio TAL : 0.51 MNSO : 0.01
PS Ratio TAL : 0.79 MNSO : 0.34
PB Ratio TAL : 0.61 MNSO : 3.35
Total Revenue (TTM) TAL : $2.82B MNSO : $14.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) TAL : $1.56B MNSO : $6.74B
EBITDA (TTM) TAL : $296.86M MNSO : $1.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAL achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -13.60% return.

TAL

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: 7.98%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: -13.93%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: -27.38%
• 10Y*: 3.35%

MNSO

• 1D: 5.54%
• 1M: -10.10%
• YTD: -13.60%
• 6M: -28.00%
• 1Y: -9.50%
• 3Y*: -0.36%
• 5Y*: -5.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TAL vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAL

TAL Risk / Return Rank: 30
TAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TAL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
TAL Martin Ratio Rank: 31

MNSO

MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 33
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAL vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TAL Education Group (TAL) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAL	MNSO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	-0.19	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	0.06	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.01	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	-0.24	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	-0.47	-0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAL vs. MNSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAL and MNSO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAL	MNSO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27	-0.19	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	-0.08	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	-0.04	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between TAL and MNSO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TAL vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

TAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TAL TAL Education Group	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	1.28%	4.07%
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	3.80%	3.29%	2.36%	2.02%	1.60%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TAL vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAL drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than MNSO's maximum drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAL and MNSO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAL	MNSO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.06%	-86.58%	-11.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.32%	-41.67%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.22%	-83.23%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.39%	-47.64%	-39.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.28%	-45.16%	+3.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.04%	20.99%	+0.05%

Volatility

TAL vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TAL Education Group (TAL) is 8.69%, while MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that TAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAL	MNSO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	10.61%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.05%	22.92%	+11.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.70%	49.17%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.02%	67.84%	+19.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.25%	69.30%	-0.05%

Financials

TAL vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TAL Education Group and MINISO Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TAL Education Group reported a gross profit of 432.69M and revenue of 771.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 361.87M and revenue of 809.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

TAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TAL Education Group reported an operating income of 93.31M and revenue of 771.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 112.99M and revenue of 809.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

TAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TAL Education Group reported a net income of 130.86M and revenue of 771.74M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 440.54M and revenue of 809.88M, resulting in a net margin of 54.4%.