PortfoliosLab logo
TAIL vs. FAIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TAIL and FAIL is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

TAIL vs. FAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


TAIL

YTD

9.25%

1M

-4.46%

6M

8.69%

1Y

7.39%

3Y*

-7.65%

5Y*

-9.78%

10Y*

N/A

FAIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cambria Tail Risk ETF

Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF

TAIL vs. FAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FAIL's 0.63% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TAIL vs. FAIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAIL is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAIL is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAIL is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAIL is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAIL is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAIL is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAIL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TAIL vs. FAIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TAIL vs. FAIL - Dividend Comparison

TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while FAIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
2.64%3.47%3.73%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%
FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
1.63%3.92%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.63%4.69%4.17%4.94%3.13%

Drawdowns

TAIL vs. FAIL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TAIL vs. FAIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...