TAGS vs. GLD
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TAGS returned -1.74%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
TAGS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -1.74%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
TAGS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and GLD is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.06 |
The correlation between TAGS and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TAGS vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAGS
GLD
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TAGS
GLD
-
Basic Materials
TAGS
-
GLD
Communication Services
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Energy
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Industrials
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Real Estate
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Technology
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Utilities
TAGS
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
GLD
TAGS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 1.68 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 4.15 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.21 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 1.01 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.83 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.60 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -45.56% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -19.21% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | -19.21% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -21.03% | -16.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | -22.00% | -25.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.69% | -17.75% | -45.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -16.16% | -41.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 7.73% | -1.85% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.51% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 23.16% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 26.61% | -14.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 18.00% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 15.95% | +2.09% |
TAGS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAGS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and GLD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs -1.74% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
TAGS and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GLD is Gold. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer