PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGS vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -1.74%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


TAGS

1D
-1.20%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
6.11%
6M
4.04%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
-7.08%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*
-1.74%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
6.11%-8.76%-14.57%-6.11%16.25%27.05%8.19%-4.53%-7.10%-13.94%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGS and GLD is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012

0.06

The correlation between TAGS and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TAGS vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TAGS
GLD

Financial Services

99.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TAGS
99.9%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

TAGS

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Energy

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Industrials

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Technology

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Utilities

TAGS

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGSGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.68

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

4.15

-4.31

TAGS vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGS and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGSGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

1.21

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

1.01

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

0.83

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.60

-0.83

Drawdowns

TAGS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGSGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-45.56%

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-19.21%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.59%

-19.21%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-21.03%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

-22.00%

-25.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.69%

-17.75%

-45.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-16.16%

-41.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.88%

7.73%

-1.85%

Volatility

TAGS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGSGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

5.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

23.16%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

26.61%

-14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

18.00%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

15.95%

+2.09%

TAGS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither TAGS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGS and GLD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs -1.74% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

TAGS and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GLD is Gold. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.40% for GLD.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGS and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer