PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRU.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRU.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRU.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SXRU.DE having a 8.17% return and SCHG slightly lower at 8.00%. Over the past 10 years, SXRU.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.56%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.


SXRU.DE

1D
1.22%
1M
4.78%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.26%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.56%

SCHG

1D
0.00%
1M
4.08%
YTD
8.00%
6M
5.93%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
18.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRU.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.17%2.08%21.16%11.74%-2.47%31.86%-1.58%28.17%-0.48%12.04%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
5.62%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRU.DE and SCHG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRU.DE
SXRU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SXRU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRU.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRU.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.53

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

4.41

+4.82

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRU.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRU.DESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.51

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.85

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.92

-0.25

Drawdowns

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRU.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.09%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRU.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRU.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.09%

-31.88%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-15.64%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-28.18%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-30.34%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.09%

-31.88%

-4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.27%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-5.23%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

5.40%

-3.19%

Volatility

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRU.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRU.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.87%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

11.10%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

15.82%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

21.96%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

21.86%

-5.85%

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRU.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXRU.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SXRU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SXRU.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRU.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SXRU.DE.

SXRU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SXRU.DE tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SXRU.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRU.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer