SXRG.DE vs. IJH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRG.DE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH).
SXRG.DE and IJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXRG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced Focus CTB. It was launched on Jul 1, 2009. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both SXRG.DE and IJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXRG.DE or IJH.
Key characteristics
| SXRG.DE | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.06% | 21.11% |
| 1Y Return | 42.10% | 38.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.32% | 6.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.57% | 12.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.14% | 10.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.97 | 2.46 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.92 | 3.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.21 | 2.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.69 | 14.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.61% | 2.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.97% | 16.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.79% | -55.07% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRG.DE and IJH is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SXRG.DE having a 22.06% return and IJH slightly lower at 21.11%. Over the past 10 years, SXRG.DE has outperformed IJH with an annualized return of 11.14%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRG.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRG.DE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
SXRG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRG.DE iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRG.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRG.DE and IJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXRG.DE vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 5.10%. This indicates that SXRG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.