SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
SXR4.DE and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXR4.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both SXR4.DE and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXR4.DE or CNDX.L.
Key characteristics
| SXR4.DE | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 28.79% | 24.93% |
| 1Y Return | 37.31% | 38.34% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.33% | 9.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.83% | 21.17% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.55% | 18.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.97 | 2.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.04 | 3.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.62 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.29 | 3.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.10 | 10.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.89% | 3.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.05% | 16.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.16% | -35.17% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXR4.DE and CNDX.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SXR4.DE achieves a 28.79% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR4.DE has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 14.55%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXR4.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
SXR4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXR4.DE iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXR4.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR4.DE and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXR4.DE vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) is 3.54%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that SXR4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.