SXLP.L vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
SXLP.L and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXLP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both SXLP.L and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXLP.L or GLDM.
Correlation
The correlation between SXLP.L and GLDM is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SXLP.L:
1.69
GLDM:
2.93
SXLP.L:
2.49
GLDM:
3.68
SXLP.L:
1.31
GLDM:
1.50
SXLP.L:
2.24
GLDM:
5.52
SXLP.L:
6.76
GLDM:
15.20
SXLP.L:
2.41%
GLDM:
2.94%
SXLP.L:
9.61%
GLDM:
15.29%
SXLP.L:
-24.00%
GLDM:
-21.63%
SXLP.L:
-0.27%
GLDM:
-1.48%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 9.96% return.
SXLP.L
4.74%
7.60%
4.81%
16.77%
7.54%
N/A
GLDM
9.96%
7.00%
15.01%
43.82%
12.65%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXLP.L vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SXLP.L
GLDM
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLP.L nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXLP.L vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) is 2.58%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that SXLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.