PortfoliosLab logo
SWSCX vs. XMHQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SWSCX and XMHQ is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund™ (SWSCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

SWSCX:

16.51%

XMHQ:

12.46%

Max Drawdown

SWSCX:

-0.96%

XMHQ:

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

SWSCX:

-0.28%

XMHQ:

-0.15%

Returns By Period


SWSCX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XMHQ

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWSCX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SWSCX vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWSCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SWSCX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SWSCX is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SWSCX is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SWSCX is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SWSCX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SWSCX is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XMHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMHQ is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund™ (SWSCX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

SWSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than XMHQ's 5.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SWSCX
Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund™
0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
5.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWSCX drawdown since its inception was -0.96%, which is greater than XMHQ's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSCX and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SWSCX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...