PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWRSX vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWRSX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRSX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SWRSX has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.66%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.


SWRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
2.66%

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRSX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
1.72%6.84%1.95%3.80%-12.01%5.83%10.88%8.38%-1.32%2.69%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRSX and TLT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.72

The correlation between SWRSX and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWRSX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRSX
SWRSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SWRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRSX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWRSXTLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

0.51

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

0.80

+1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.09

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

0.65

+2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.25

1.63

+6.62

SWRSX vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRSX and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWRSXTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.51

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.40

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

-0.11

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.26

+0.32

Drawdowns

SWRSX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRSX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRSX and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWRSXTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-48.35%

+34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.90%

-7.58%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.46%

-19.18%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-43.70%

+29.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.29%

-48.35%

+34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-40.44%

+40.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-13.82%

+10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

3.04%

-2.41%

Volatility

SWRSX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) is 0.86%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that SWRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWRSXTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

2.76%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

6.50%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

9.77%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

15.87%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

14.91%

-9.54%

SWRSX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRSX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWRSX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

SWRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
3.78%4.20%3.68%3.11%7.95%4.45%1.33%2.20%2.87%1.75%1.81%1.06%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWRSX and TLT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to SWRSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWRSX dropped -14.29% vs TLT's -48.35%.

SWRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWRSX and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer