SWRSX vs. EAPCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX).
SWRSX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Mar 30, 2006. EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWRSX or EAPCX.
Key characteristics
| SWRSX | EAPCX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.41% | 10.75% |
| 1Y Return | 7.48% | 9.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.40% | 7.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.06% | 11.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.04% | 3.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.31 | 0.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.94 | 1.18 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.22 | 2.09 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.06% | 4.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.07% | 11.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.14% | -50.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.02% | -5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRSX and EAPCX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SWRSX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SWRSX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWRSX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison
SWRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than EAPCX's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRSX Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund | 3.74% | 3.11% | 7.07% | 4.33% | 1.25% | 2.20% | 2.88% | 1.99% | 1.81% | 0.77% | 2.30% | 1.42% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 3.10% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 2.92% | 1.12% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.50% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRSX drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRSX and EAPCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWRSX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) is 1.16%, while Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that SWRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.