SWRD.AS vs. SPGM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM).
SWRD.AS and SPGM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SWRD.AS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. SPGM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World IMI. It was launched on Feb 27, 2012. Both SWRD.AS and SPGM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWRD.AS or SPGM.
Key characteristics
| SWRD.AS | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.56% | 18.35% |
| 1Y Return | 32.49% | 26.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.94% | 5.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.00 | 2.48 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.99 | 3.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.58 | 3.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.72 | 15.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.73% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.78% | 11.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.61% | -33.96% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRD.AS and SPGM is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SWRD.AS achieves a 26.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's 18.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWRD.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
SWRD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRD.AS SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.72% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% | 2.18% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.AS and SPGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) have volatilities of 3.06% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.