SWRD.AS vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWRD.AS (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds from State Street - SWRD.AS tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.AS returned 12.98%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for SPGM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWRD.AS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.

Performance

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SWRD.AS is traded in EUR, while SPGM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPGM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.AS achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 14.23% return.

SWRD.AS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: —

SPGM

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 5.69%
• YTD: 14.23%
• 6M: 14.24%
• 1Y: 29.07%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWRD.AS SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	11.10%	7.29%	27.33%	20.14%	-13.35%	32.60%	6.05%	15.56%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	14.23%	8.95%	24.45%	17.71%	-12.42%	30.19%	5.78%	15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.AS and SPGM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019	0.63

The correlation between SWRD.AS and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.AS

SWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 68
SWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWRD.AS	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.37	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.12	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	4.33	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.76	18.31	-3.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.AS and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWRD.AS	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.37	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.84	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.70	+0.15

Drawdowns

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.AS and SPGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWRD.AS	SPGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-33.20%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.49%	-6.75%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.51%	-20.87%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	-20.87%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.65%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-4.16%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.59%	+0.02%

Volatility

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.AS) is 2.79%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that SWRD.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWRD.AS	SPGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	3.19%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	9.30%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.06%	12.35%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	15.04%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.01%	17.44%	-1.43%

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWRD.AS vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

SWRD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.79%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%
SWRD.AS SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWRD.AS and SPGM in my portfolio?

SWRD.AS and SPGM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SWRD.AS or SPGM?

On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWRD.AS or SPGM?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SWRD.AS.

What is the main difference between SWRD.AS and SPGM?

SWRD.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.AS and 0.09% for SPGM.