PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWORX vs. SWYNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2055 Fund (SWORX) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWORX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than SWYNX's 12.46% return.


SWORX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.39%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.44%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
11.71%

SWYNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.73%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.72%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWORX
Schwab Target 2055 Fund
11.14%20.10%14.04%20.77%-19.88%18.22%15.33%25.61%-10.25%21.38%
SWYNX
Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund
12.46%20.19%14.71%23.96%-17.93%18.84%14.88%26.10%-9.98%20.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SWORX and SWYNX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between SWORX and SWYNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWORX vs. SWYNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWORX
SWORX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SWORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWORX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SWORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWORX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYNX
SWYNX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWYNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2055 Fund (SWORX) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWORXSWYNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.13

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

13.73

-1.50

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWORX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SWYNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWORX and SWYNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWORX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SWYNX drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWORX and SWYNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWORXSWYNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-31.91%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-9.01%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-15.75%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-25.90%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.39%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-4.86%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.05%

+0.12%

Volatility

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2055 Fund (SWORX) and Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund (SWYNX) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWORXSWYNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.76%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

10.32%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

12.56%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

15.50%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.61%

+0.09%

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWORX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWYNX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWORX vs. SWYNX - Dividend Comparison

SWORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than SWYNX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWORX
Schwab Target 2055 Fund
3.98%4.43%3.44%3.31%8.42%5.25%2.23%5.15%6.43%2.74%5.19%5.85%
SWYNX
Schwab Target 2060 Index Fund
1.71%1.92%1.97%4.00%1.96%1.77%1.66%1.99%0.00%1.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SWORX and SWYNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWORX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to SWYNX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWORX dropped -32.13% vs SWYNX's -31.91%.

SWYNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWORX and SWYNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer