SWLGX vs. FNCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX).
SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017. FNCMX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | -10.43% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | -1.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a -13.06% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's -10.43% return.
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FNCMX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWLGX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank
SWLGX
FNCMX
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWLGX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.91 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.32 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 4.92 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWLGX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.91 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.52 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLGX and FNCMX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than FNCMX's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.57% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and FNCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLGX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -55.08% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -13.25% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.69% | -35.64% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.16% | -13.01% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -7.91% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 3.56% | +1.06% |
Volatility
SWLGX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWLGX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.63% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 12.48% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.31% | 23.06% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 22.42% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 21.97% | +0.81% |