PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWKS vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SWKS vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWKS achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 129.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SWKS has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 3.75%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 39.68% annualized return.


SWKS

1D
-2.78%
1M
-12.62%
YTD
14.94%
6M
12.98%
1Y
1.34%
3Y*
-8.09%
5Y*
-14.33%
10Y*
3.75%

AMAT

1D
0.53%
1M
36.29%
YTD
129.75%
6M
126.41%
1Y
229.28%
3Y*
64.31%
5Y*
35.16%
10Y*
39.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWKS vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
14.94%-25.49%-18.86%26.55%-39.95%2.73%28.36%84.10%-28.30%28.69%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
129.75%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SWKS and AMAT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.37

The correlation between SWKS and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SWKS:

$10.75B

AMAT:

$470.59B

EPS

SWKS:

$2.38

AMAT:

$10.61

PE Ratio

SWKS:

29.97

AMAT:

55.50

PS Ratio

SWKS:

2.68

AMAT:

16.27

PB Ratio

SWKS:

1.86

AMAT:

19.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

SWKS:

$4.04B

AMAT:

$29.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SWKS:

$1.66B

AMAT:

$14.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

SWKS:

$621.40M

AMAT:

$9.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWKS vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWKS
SWKS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SWKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWKS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SWKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWKS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWKS vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWKSAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.59

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

10.80

-10.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

30.65

-30.58

SWKS vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWKS Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWKS and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWKS vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWKS drawdown since its inception was -96.12%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWKS and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWKSAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.12%

-85.22%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.24%

-21.37%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.20%

-49.88%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.55%

-55.14%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.88%

-55.14%

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.57%

-8.00%

-50.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.81%

-38.76%

-17.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.20%

7.52%

+11.68%

Volatility

SWKS vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) is 18.87%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 22.37%. This indicates that SWKS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWKSAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

22.37%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.76%

39.95%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.50%

50.12%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.95%

44.48%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.19%

43.08%

-2.89%

Dividends

SWKS vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

SWKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than AMAT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.32%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
3.98%4.45%3.11%2.31%2.59%1.37%1.23%1.36%2.09%1.26%1.45%1.02%

Financials

SWKS vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
943.70M
7.91B
(SWKS) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SWKS vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.8%
49.9%
Portfolio components
SWKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 385.40M and revenue of 943.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

SWKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.10M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

SWKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 35.60M and revenue of 943.70M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SWKS and AMAT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to SWKS (18.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWKS dropped -96.12% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWKS and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer