SWIRX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
SWIRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Mar 11, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
SWIRX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWIRX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | -3.23% | 16.49% | 11.73% | 17.92% | -17.91% | 14.21% | 14.05% | 21.85% | -8.24% | 19.13% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWIRX achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SWIRX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
SWIRX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWIRX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWIRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWIRX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SWIRX
VOO
SWIRX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWIRX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.53 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 7.29 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWIRX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.78 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.83 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWIRX and VOO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWIRX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | 7.05% | 6.82% | 3.96% | 3.42% | 7.40% | 5.81% | 2.87% | 6.33% | 7.12% | 3.37% | 5.74% | 8.16% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
SWIRX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWIRX drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIRX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWIRX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.53% | -33.99% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -11.98% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -24.52% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.70% | -33.99% | +5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -6.29% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -3.72% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.52% | -0.65% |
Volatility
SWIRX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) is 3.79%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that SWIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWIRX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 5.29% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 9.44% | -2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 18.10% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.82% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 17.99% | -4.54% |