SWHFX vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SWHFX (Schwab Health Care Fund™) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - SWHFX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX returned 7.70%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SWHFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWHFX having a 5.02% return and SCHG slightly lower at 4.99%. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.70%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.

SWHFX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 3.12%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: 5.89%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 7.70%
• ALL TIME*: 8.71%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™	5.02%	9.81%	0.10%	0.73%	-4.66%	23.36%	12.83%	17.64%	3.68%	20.31%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and SCHG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between SWHFX and SCHG has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWHFX

SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWHFX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.82	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.20	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	0.83	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	2.62	-0.30

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWHFX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.10%	-34.59%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.74%	-16.41%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-23.39%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	-34.59%	+15.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.28%	-34.59%	+7.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-3.10%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-5.19%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	5.19%	+1.26%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that SWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWHFX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	4.32%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	12.90%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	16.67%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	22.42%	-7.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	21.59%	-5.54%

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWHFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™	0.00%	0.00%	9.49%	3.60%	4.18%	12.52%	11.47%	4.56%	10.02%	7.32%	2.63%	16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWHFX and SCHG in my portfolio?

SWHFX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWHFX or SCHG?

SWHFX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.