SWERX vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
SWERX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020.
Performance
SWERX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWERX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWERX Schwab Target 2040 Fund | -3.60% | 17.71% | 12.74% | 19.06% | -18.57% | 15.65% | 8.04% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -5.92% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.
SWERX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
QQQM
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWERX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWERX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWERX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
SWERX
QQQM
SWERX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWERX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.65 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.89 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 6.96 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWERX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWERX and QQQM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWERX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWERX Schwab Target 2040 Fund | 7.45% | 7.19% | 5.00% | 3.83% | 8.31% | 6.96% | 3.33% | 7.69% | 8.57% | 4.13% | 6.76% | 10.85% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SWERX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWERX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.24% | -35.04% | -13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -12.55% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -35.04% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -8.99% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -8.47% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 3.41% | -1.34% |
Volatility
SWERX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) is 4.18%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that SWERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWERX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 6.48% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 12.73% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 22.42% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 22.25% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 22.27% | -7.46% |