PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWBI vs. RGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SWBI vs. RGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a 56.57% return, which is significantly higher than RGR's 19.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has outperformed RGR with an annualized return of 0.62%, while RGR has yielded a comparatively lower -1.10% annualized return.


SWBI

1D
1.12%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
56.57%
6M
79.43%
1Y
71.64%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
-3.50%
10Y*
0.62%

RGR

1D
-0.26%
1M
-9.76%
YTD
19.54%
6M
27.80%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
-8.30%
5Y*
-9.66%
10Y*
-1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWBI vs. RGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWBI
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
56.57%3.12%-22.59%62.17%-49.58%1.64%150.33%-27.84%0.16%-39.09%
RGR
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
19.54%-6.13%-20.91%-8.04%-15.41%9.30%50.28%-10.14%-2.84%8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SWBI and RGR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1999

0.41

Over the past year, SWBI and RGR have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SWBI:

$686.27M

RGR:

$631.05M

EPS

SWBI:

$0.27

RGR:

-$0.73

PS Ratio

SWBI:

1.40

RGR:

1.15

PB Ratio

SWBI:

1.89

RGR:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

SWBI:

$486.22M

RGR:

$551.68M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SWBI:

$128.56M

RGR:

$79.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

SWBI:

$21.91M

RGR:

-$2.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWBI vs. RGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWBI
SWBI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SWBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWBI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

RGR
RGR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWBI vs. RGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWBIRGRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

0.30

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

0.59

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.22

+2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.39

0.49

+4.91

SWBI vs. RGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the RGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWBI and RGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWBIRGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

0.30

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.32

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.03

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.21

-0.05

Drawdowns

SWBI vs. RGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than RGR's maximum drawdown of -79.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and RGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWBIRGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.15%

-79.69%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.81%

-38.79%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.24%

-46.00%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.38%

-60.59%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.49%

-60.59%

-20.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.18%

-46.60%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.48%

-31.95%

-17.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.81%

17.43%

-4.62%

Volatility

SWBI vs. RGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) is 7.50%, while Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that SWBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWBIRGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

9.67%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.52%

19.88%

+11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.45%

35.39%

+10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.71%

30.35%

+17.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.72%

33.17%

+18.55%

Dividends

SWBI vs. RGR - Dividend Comparison

SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than RGR's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGR
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
1.00%1.90%1.95%2.79%14.66%4.94%10.00%1.74%2.07%2.44%3.28%1.85%
SWBI
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
3.40%5.27%5.05%3.39%4.38%1.63%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SWBI vs. RGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
135.71M
141.36M
(SWBI) Total Revenue
(RGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SWBI vs. RGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.2%
19.9%
Portfolio components
SWBI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.59M and revenue of 135.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.

RGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.08M and revenue of 141.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.9%.

SWBI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.71M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

RGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.95M and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.

SWBI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 3.75M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

RGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 128.00K and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SWBI and RGR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGR has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to SWBI (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBI dropped -96.15% vs RGR's -79.69%.

SWBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWBI and RGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer