SWBI vs. IDCBY
SWBI (Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.) and IDCBY (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited) are both stocks. SWBI operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while IDCBY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SWBI returned 0.17%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for IDCBY. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a 70.48% return, which is significantly higher than IDCBY's 13.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has underperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of 0.17%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
SWBI
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 70.48%
- 6M
- 64.97%
- 1Y
- 101.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- -7.76%
- 10Y*
- 0.17%
IDCBY
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 70.48% | 3.12% | -22.59% | 62.17% | -49.58% | 1.64% | 150.33% | -27.84% | 0.16% | -39.09% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 13.77% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -8.08% | 42.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBI and IDCBY is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2009 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
SWBI:
$754.52M
IDCBY:
$317.74B
SWBI:
$0.41
IDCBY:
CN¥20.11
SWBI:
40.38
IDCBY:
6.00
SWBI:
1.42
IDCBY:
1.70
SWBI:
2.00
IDCBY:
0.55
SWBI:
$523.85M
IDCBY:
CN¥1.28T
SWBI:
$141.10M
IDCBY:
CN¥499.90B
SWBI:
-$1.98M
IDCBY:
CN¥428.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWBI vs. IDCBY — Risk / Return Rank
SWBI
IDCBY
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 1.88 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 5.37 | +10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and IDCBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.15% | -78.73% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -11.23% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.24% | -15.59% | -38.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.38% | -25.73% | -49.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.49% | -39.70% | -41.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.58% | -3.26% | -40.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.47% | -48.86% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 3.93% | +2.64% |
Volatility
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a higher volatility of 18.36% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) at 6.56%. This indicates that SWBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.36% | 6.56% | +11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.28% | 13.11% | +16.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.24% | 18.49% | +25.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 21.31% | +25.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.88% | 22.80% | +29.08% |
Dividends
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison
SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than IDCBY's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 7.58% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 3.12% | 5.27% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Profitability Comparison
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.09M and revenue of 178.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 155.43B and revenue of 386.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.34M and revenue of 178.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 101.34B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 16.22M and revenue of 178.39M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 86.42B and revenue of 386.17B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWBI and IDCBY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWBI has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to IDCBY (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBI dropped -96.15% vs IDCBY's -78.73%.
SWBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWBI and IDCBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer