SWBI vs. IDCBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWBI or IDCBY.
Correlation
The correlation between SWBI and IDCBY is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SWBI:
-0.38
IDCBY:
2.06
SWBI:
-0.28
IDCBY:
2.78
SWBI:
0.96
IDCBY:
1.38
SWBI:
-0.26
IDCBY:
1.87
SWBI:
-0.88
IDCBY:
13.08
SWBI:
20.55%
IDCBY:
4.29%
SWBI:
47.94%
IDCBY:
27.27%
SWBI:
-96.59%
IDCBY:
-46.05%
SWBI:
-67.19%
IDCBY:
-2.46%
Fundamentals
SWBI:
$454.55M
IDCBY:
$297.86B
SWBI:
$0.78
IDCBY:
$2.67
SWBI:
13.24
IDCBY:
4.75
SWBI:
$514.64M
IDCBY:
$1.02T
SWBI:
$158.31M
IDCBY:
$1.02T
SWBI:
$73.45M
IDCBY:
$212.23B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than IDCBY's -2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has underperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of 2.74%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.
SWBI
2.23%
-1.62%
-31.02%
-17.77%
10.15%
2.74%
IDCBY
-2.46%
4.60%
20.23%
55.13%
4.44%
5.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SWBI
IDCBY
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison
SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than IDCBY's 9.78% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 4.94% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 9.78% | 6.29% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% |
Drawdowns
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and IDCBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) is 7.97%, while Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that SWBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities