SWBI vs. IDCBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY).
Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 46.55% | 3.12% | -22.59% | 62.17% | -49.58% | 1.64% | 150.33% | -27.84% | 0.16% | -39.09% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 9.84% | 32.13% | 47.21% | 3.91% | -2.05% | -6.39% | -12.54% | 13.02% | -8.08% | 42.02% |
Fundamentals
SWBI:
$642.34M
IDCBY:
$315.42B
SWBI:
$0.27
IDCBY:
$19.94
SWBI:
53.23
IDCBY:
0.89
SWBI:
1.31
IDCBY:
0.21
SWBI:
1.77
IDCBY:
0.08
SWBI:
$486.22M
IDCBY:
$1.49T
SWBI:
$128.56M
IDCBY:
$665.53B
SWBI:
$21.91M
IDCBY:
$429.60B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than IDCBY's 9.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has underperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of -2.04%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.
SWBI
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 21.55%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 48.98%
- 1Y
- 61.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- -2.04%
IDCBY
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWBI vs. IDCBY — Risk / Return Rank
SWBI
IDCBY
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.59 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 2.23 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.52 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 7.86 | -3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.59 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.60 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.54 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.15 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBI and IDCBY is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison
SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than IDCBY's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 3.63% | 5.27% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 4.84% | 7.76% | 6.36% | 8.69% | 8.61% | 7.32% | 4.84% | 3.91% | 4.48% | 3.49% | 12.32% | 7.11% |
Drawdowns
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and IDCBY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.15% | -78.73% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -12.37% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.38% | -30.39% | -44.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.49% | -39.70% | -41.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.50% | -2.23% | -49.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.48% | -49.50% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.84% | 4.06% | +8.78% |
Volatility
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a higher volatility of 18.34% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) at 5.95%. This indicates that SWBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBI | IDCBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.34% | 5.95% | +12.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.43% | 13.01% | +20.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.41% | 19.94% | +26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.05% | 21.29% | +26.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.12% | 22.98% | +29.14% |
Financials
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Profitability Comparison
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.59M and revenue of 135.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 360.46B and revenue of 745.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.71M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 67.55B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 3.75M and revenue of 135.71M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 89.14B and revenue of 745.00B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.