Correlation
The correlation between SWBI and IDCBY is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
SWBI vs. IDCBY
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWBI or IDCBY.
Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SWBI:
-0.96
IDCBY:
1.23
SWBI:
-1.19
IDCBY:
1.70
SWBI:
0.81
IDCBY:
1.23
SWBI:
-0.53
IDCBY:
2.09
SWBI:
-1.36
IDCBY:
6.69
SWBI:
28.50%
IDCBY:
4.87%
SWBI:
40.70%
IDCBY:
28.10%
SWBI:
-96.59%
IDCBY:
-46.05%
SWBI:
-69.75%
IDCBY:
-1.50%
Fundamentals
SWBI:
$413.63M
IDCBY:
$328.02B
SWBI:
$0.65
IDCBY:
$2.69
SWBI:
14.46
IDCBY:
5.38
SWBI:
0.84
IDCBY:
0.50
SWBI:
1.14
IDCBY:
0.48
SWBI:
$333.90M
IDCBY:
$1.01T
SWBI:
$89.53M
IDCBY:
$1.01T
SWBI:
$25.33M
IDCBY:
$211.68B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than IDCBY's 11.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has underperformed IDCBY with an annualized return of -0.54%, while IDCBY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.61% annualized return.
SWBI
-5.73%
-2.08%
-27.87%
-38.98%
-8.82%
6.43%
-0.54%
IDCBY
11.40%
2.99%
27.00%
35.59%
17.12%
11.05%
4.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWBI vs. IDCBY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SWBI
IDCBY
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Dividend Comparison
SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than IDCBY's 8.59% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. | 5.53% | 5.05% | 3.39% | 4.38% | 1.63% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDCBY Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited | 8.59% | 6.29% | 8.64% | 8.51% | 7.37% | 5.73% | 4.70% | 5.33% | 4.23% | 6.00% | 6.81% | 5.77% |
Drawdowns
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than IDCBY's maximum drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and IDCBY.
Loading data...
Volatility
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Volatility Comparison
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (IDCBY) at 3.90%. This indicates that SWBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDCBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWBI vs. IDCBY - Profitability Comparison
SWBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.95M and revenue of 115.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
IDCBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a gross profit of 211.39B and revenue of 211.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
SWBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.13M and revenue of 115.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
IDCBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported an operating income of 155.24B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 73.4%.
SWBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 1.66M and revenue of 115.89M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
IDCBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited reported a net income of 84.16B and revenue of 211.39B, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.