SWBI vs. FTBFX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).

FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.

Performance

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.	46.55%	3.12%	-22.59%	62.17%	-49.58%	1.64%	150.33%	-27.84%	0.16%	-39.09%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	-0.49%	7.50%	2.50%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWBI achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBI has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of -2.04%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.58% annualized return.

SWBI

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 21.55%
• YTD: 46.55%
• 6M: 48.98%
• 1Y: 61.69%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: -1.07%
• 10Y*: -2.04%

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 4.43%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: 2.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SWBI vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWBI

SWBI Risk / Return Rank: 81
SWBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SWBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SWBI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SWBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SWBI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWBI	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.10	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	1.57	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.20	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	1.86	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	5.73	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWBI and FTBFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWBI	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.10	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.15	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04	0.55	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.93	-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between SWBI and FTBFX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

SWBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than FTBFX's 4.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SWBI Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.	3.63%	5.27%	5.05%	3.39%	4.38%	1.63%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.02%	4.36%	4.51%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%

Drawdowns

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWBI drawdown since its inception was -96.15%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBI and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWBI	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.15%	-18.25%	-77.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.81%	-2.81%	-25.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.38%	-18.25%	-57.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.49%	-18.25%	-63.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.50%	-2.35%	-49.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.48%	-2.31%	-47.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.84%	0.91%	+11.93%

Volatility

SWBI vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) has a higher volatility of 18.34% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.48%. This indicates that SWBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWBI	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.34%	1.48%	+16.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.43%	2.46%	+30.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.41%	4.30%	+42.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.05%	5.62%	+42.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.12%	4.70%	+47.42%