SWBGX vs. SFSNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX).
SWBGX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995. SFSNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SWBGX or SFSNX.
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and SFSNX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SWBGX:
1.22
SFSNX:
0.34
SWBGX:
1.70
SFSNX:
0.61
SWBGX:
1.23
SFSNX:
1.07
SWBGX:
2.38
SFSNX:
0.64
SWBGX:
7.25
SFSNX:
1.71
SWBGX:
1.33%
SFSNX:
3.71%
SWBGX:
7.93%
SFSNX:
18.47%
SWBGX:
-40.37%
SFSNX:
-62.68%
SWBGX:
-2.59%
SFSNX:
-9.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than SFSNX's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has underperformed SFSNX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while SFSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.
SWBGX
10.02%
-1.71%
4.61%
9.67%
6.10%
6.18%
SFSNX
7.68%
-8.38%
7.81%
6.39%
9.42%
8.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SFSNX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWBGX nor SFSNX has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 0.00% | 2.25% | 1.82% | 1.60% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.79% | 1.72% | 2.04% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 0.00% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.42% | 1.41% | 1.91% | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 1.22% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, smaller than the maximum SFSNX drawdown of -62.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and SFSNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SWBGX vs. SFSNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) is 2.56%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that SWBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.