SWASX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | -2.49% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.50% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
SWSSX
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.91 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.40 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.33 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 5.02 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.91 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.14 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.33 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and SWSSX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SWSSX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SWSSX's maximum drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -60.34% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -13.90% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -31.93% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -41.81% | -2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -11.00% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -10.78% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.68% | -1.10% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.05%, while Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 6.59% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 14.12% | -6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 23.11% | -9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 22.57% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 24.03% | -6.99% |